Costs of Drug Development and Research and Development Intensity in the US, 2000-2018

被引:19
作者
Sertkaya, Aylin [1 ]
Beleche, Trinidad [2 ]
Jessup, Amber [2 ,3 ]
Sommers, Benjamin D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Res Grp Inc, 110 Hartwell Ave, Lexington, MA 02421 USA
[2] US Dept HHS, Off Assistant Secretary Planning & Evaluat, Off Sci & Data Policy, Washington, DC USA
[3] US Dept HHS, Off Inspector Gen, Washington, DC USA
[4] US Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Washington, DC USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
关键词
INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15445
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Understanding the cost of drug development can help inform the development of policies to reduce costs, encourage innovation, and improve patient access to drugs. OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost of drug development by therapeutic class and trends in pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) intensity over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this economic evaluation study, an analytical model of drug development constructed using public and proprietary sources that collectively cover data from 2000 to 2018 was used to estimate the cost of bringing a drug to market, overall and for specific therapeutic classes. The analysis for the study was completed in October 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Three measures of development cost from nonclinical through postmarketing stages were estimated: mean out-of-pocket cost or cash outlay, mean expected cost, and mean expected capitalized cost. Pharmaceutical R&D intensity, defined as the ratio of R&D spending to total sales, from 2008 to 2019, based on the time frame for available data, was also analyzed. RESULTS The estimated mean cost of developing a new drug was approximately $172.7 million (2018 dollars) (range, $72.5 million for genitourinary to $297.2 million for pain and anesthesia), inclusive of postmarketing studies. The cost increased to $515.8 million when cost of failures was included. When the costs of failures and capital were included, the mean expected capitalized cost of drug development increased to $879.3 million (range, $378.7 million for anti-infectives to $1756.2 million for pain and anesthesia); results varied widely by therapeutic class. The pharmaceutical industry as a whole experienced a decline of 15.6% in sales but increased R&D intensity from 11.9% to 17.7% from 2008 to 2019. By contrast, R&D intensity of large pharmaceutical companies increased from 16.6% to 19.3%, whereas sales increased by 10.0% (from $380.0 to $418.0 billion) over the same 2008 to 2019 period, even though the cost of drug development remained relatively stable or may have even decreased. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this economic evaluation of new drug development costs, even though the cost of drug development appears to have remained stable, R&D intensity of large pharmaceutical companies remained relatively unchanged, despite substantial growth in revenues during this period. These findings can inform the design of drug-related policies and their potential impacts on innovation and competition.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] SPENDING ON NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENT
    Adams, Christopher Paul
    Brantner, Van Vu
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (02) : 130 - 141
  • [2] Estimating the cost of new drug development: Is it really $802 million?
    Adams, CP
    Brantner, VV
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (02) : 420 - 428
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Outpatient antibiotic prescriptions-United States, 2021
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Drug industry: Profits, research and development spending, and merger and acquisition deals
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, Outpatient antibiotic prescriptions, United States
  • [7] Bosworth A., 2022, Price increases for prescription drugs, 20162022
  • [8] Chen L., 2015, FORBES
  • [9] Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, 2022, CBO esti- mates drug savings for reconciliation
  • [10] DiMasi JA, 2004, DRUG INF J, V38, P211, DOI 10.1177/009286150403800301