Do Firms Proactively Build Internal Markets for Redeployment? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Sohl, Timo [1 ]
Folta, Timothy B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pompeu Fabra Univ, UPF Barcelona Sch Management, Barcelona 08008, Spain
[2] Univ Connecticut, Sch Business, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
corporate strategy; related diversification; resource redeployability; German real estate transfer tax reform; RESOURCE REDEPLOYMENT; OPPORTUNITY COSTS; TRANSFER TAXES; TRANSACTION; DETERMINANTS; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; RETAIL; SCOPE;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2021.02396
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The topic of related diversification is of fundamental interest to corporate strategy research. However, the understanding of how the potential for resource redeployment might encourage related diversification is limited. This paper explores the impact of the 2006 German real estate transfer tax (RETT) reform, which led to higher RETT rates but retained the exemption from RETT for corporate restructurings. We propose that firms might have reacted strategically to the threat of higher transfer taxes by combining related businesses into a portfolio, providing an efficient internal market for reallocating property assets in the event of business -specific shocks. Consistent with a dynamic perspective on relatedness, difference -in -differences analyses of the European retail market show that the probability of related diversification increased significantly for firms that were affected by the reform, relative to control firms. This finding contributes to the literature that links firm boundary choices to intertemporal economies of scope and offers new insights into the real effects of transfer tax policies.
引用
收藏
页码:2487 / 2507
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Commitment to build trust by socially responsible firms: Evidence from cash holdings
    Chang, Ching-Hung
    Chen, Sheng-Syan
    Chen, Yan-Shing
    Peng, Shu-Cing
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2019, 56 : 364 - 387
  • [22] DO FOREIGN FIRMS CROWD OUT DOMESTIC FIRMS? EVIDENCE FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Kosova, Renata
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2010, 92 (04) : 861 - 881
  • [23] How Do Firms Respond to Political Uncertainty? Evidence from US Gubernatorial Elections
    Bird, Andrew
    Karolyi, Stephen A.
    Ruchti, Thomas G.
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (04) : 1025 - 1061
  • [24] Do Firms Follow Immigrants? Empirical Evidence From Italy
    Etzo, Ivan
    Massidda, Carla
    Piras, Romano
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 2020, 111 (05) : 718 - 737
  • [25] Why Do Firms Switch Banks? Evidence from China
    Yin, Wei
    Matthews, Kent
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2018, 54 (09) : 2040 - 2052
  • [26] DO GOVERNMENTAL SUBSIDIES INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY OF FIRMS? EVIDENCE FROM A PANEL OF SLOVENE FIRMS
    Domadenik, Polona
    Koman, Matjaz
    Prasnikar, Janez
    DRUSTVENA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2018, 27 (02): : 199 - 220
  • [27] Do Firms' Social Media Fake News Clarifications Mitigate the PEAD Anomaly? Evidence from a Policy Experiment in China
    Wang, Maobin
    Ye, Tao
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (05) : 1281 - 1299
  • [28] Do Women Avoid Salary Negotiations? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
    Leibbrandt, Andreas
    List, John A.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (09) : 2016 - 2024
  • [29] Do firms have leverage targets? Evidence from acquisitions
    Harford, Jarrad
    Klasa, Sandy
    Walcott, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 93 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [30] Social norms, sanctions, and conditional entry in markets with externalities: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment
    Riehm, Tobias
    Fugger, Nicolas
    Gillen, Philippe
    Gretschko, Vitali
    Werner, Peter
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2022, 212