Comprehensive Evaluation of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic Dental Implant Materials: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties

被引:0
|
作者
Peter, Claudia [1 ]
Shah, Krupali [2 ]
Simon, Lovebin [3 ]
Shyama, P. M. [4 ]
Ashwathi, N. [5 ]
El-Shamy, Fahiem Mohammad [6 ]
机构
[1] Rajas Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Tirunelveli, India
[2] KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Dept Periodontol & Implantol, Vadodara, India
[3] Century Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Thekkil, India
[4] Kunhitharuvai Mem Charitable Trust KMCT Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Kozhikode, India
[5] Kannur Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont, Anjarakandy, India
[6] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Biomat, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
implants; ceramics; titanium; aesthetic properties; zirconia; TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.60582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant materials play a pivotal role in the success of restorative dentistry. This study comprehensively compares the mechanical and esthetic properties of three commonly used dental implant materials: titanium, zirconia, and ceramic. Objective: This study aimed to provide insights into the suitability of titanium, zirconia, and ceramic for various clinical applications within implant dentistry. Methods: Ninety dental implants, 30 for each material, were selected based on their well -established usage in dental implantology. Mechanical properties, including tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and fatigue resistance, were assessed using state-of-the-art testing machines. Esthetic properties, such as color stability and translucency, were scrutinized through immersion in staining solutions and spectrophotometer measurements. Fracture properties and biocompatibility were also evaluated. Results: Mechanical testing revealed that titanium exhibited the highest tensile strength (810 +/- 55 MPa), while zirconia demonstrated the highest modulus of elasticity (208 +/- 8 GPa). Titanium also displayed the greatest fatigue resistance (1,010,000 +/- 95,000 cycles), whereas zirconia had the highest hardness (1190 +/- 45 Vickers hardness number (VHN)). Esthetically, zirconia showed superior color stability ( Delta E: 1.7 +/- 0.2), while ceramic exhibited the highest translucency (TP%: 15.3 +/- 1.7). Zirconia presented the lowest surface roughness (0.28 +/- 0.04 mu m). Conclusion: This study provides insights into potential dental implant material performance, with zirconia emerging as a promising alternative. Future research should validate these findings in clinical settings, considering a broader array of variables and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Material Fatigue Research for Zirconia Ceramic Dental Implant: a Comparative Laboratory and Simulation Study in Dentistry
    Karacali, O.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2015, 127 (04) : 1195 - 1198
  • [12] Investigation of the structure and mechanical properties of a novel dental graded glass/zirconia ceramic
    Zhou, Ming
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Yaming
    Li, Ding
    Zhao, Zhe
    Lyu, Xigeng
    Wang, Qing
    Tang, Kai
    Jia, Yanmin
    Niu, Lina
    Wang, Fu
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 43 (13) : 5671 - 5681
  • [13] Mechanical and optical properties evaluation of rapid sintered dental zirconia
    Yang, Chun-Chuan
    Ding, Shinn-Jyh
    Lin, Tzu-Hao
    Yan, Min
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 46 (17) : 26668 - 26674
  • [14] Comparative Measurement on Translucency of Four Systems of Dental All-ceramic Zirconia Materials
    Lu, Rong-Jian
    Ge, Cheng
    Sun, Li
    Shi, Guang
    Wang, Cheng-Long
    Shao, Long-Quan
    Liu, Yi-Han
    Wen, Ning
    Deng, Bin
    DIANCHI ADVANCED MATERIALS FORUM 2013, 2014, 833 : 181 - +
  • [15] Comparative Measurement on Transmittance of Four Systems of Dental All-Ceramic Zirconia Materials
    Deng, Bin
    Xu, Juan
    Shi, Guang
    Liang, Li-Min
    Yi, Yuan-Fu
    Shao, Long-Quan
    Wen, Ning
    Gu, Bin
    Liu, Yi-Han
    Chen, Ji-Hua
    DIANCHI ADVANCED MATERIALS FORUM 2013, 2014, 833 : 185 - +
  • [16] FEA Comparison of the Mechanical Behavior of Three Dental Crown Materials: Enamel, Ceramic, and Zirconia
    Ceddia, Mario
    Lamberti, Luciano
    Trentadue, Bartolomeo
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [17] INVESTIGATIONS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TITANIUM REINFORCED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT (GiC) - CERAMIC COMPOSITES SUITABLE FOR DENTAL IMPLANT APPLICATIONS
    Durairaj, R. B.
    Sivasaravanan, S.
    Sharma, D. K.
    Ramachandran, S.
    Heboyan, A.
    DIGEST JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS AND BIOSTRUCTURES, 2021, 16 (01) : 161 - 167
  • [18] Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Dental Nanomaterials
    Peskersoy, Cem
    Culha, Osman
    JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS, 2017, 2017
  • [19] Mechanical Integrity of All-on-Four Dental Implant Systems: Finite Element Simulation of Material Properties of Zirconia, Titanium, and PEEK
    Chang, Che-Lun
    Karmakar, Riya
    Mukundan, Arvind
    Lu, Shu-Hao
    Choomjinda, Ubol
    Chen, Meei-Maan
    Chen, Yi-Ling
    Wang, Hsiang-Chen
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 18
  • [20] Effect of Therapeutic Dose X Rays on Mechanical and Chemical Properties of Esthetic Dental Materials
    da Cruz, Adriana Dibo
    Coelho Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre
    Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria
    de Souza Rastelli, Alessandra Nara
    Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
    Boscolo, Frab Norberto
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2008, 11 (03): : 313 - 318