Comprehensive Evaluation of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic Dental Implant Materials: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties

被引:0
|
作者
Peter, Claudia [1 ]
Shah, Krupali [2 ]
Simon, Lovebin [3 ]
Shyama, P. M. [4 ]
Ashwathi, N. [5 ]
El-Shamy, Fahiem Mohammad [6 ]
机构
[1] Rajas Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Tirunelveli, India
[2] KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Dept Periodontol & Implantol, Vadodara, India
[3] Century Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Thekkil, India
[4] Kunhitharuvai Mem Charitable Trust KMCT Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Kozhikode, India
[5] Kannur Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont, Anjarakandy, India
[6] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Biomat, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
implants; ceramics; titanium; aesthetic properties; zirconia; TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.60582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant materials play a pivotal role in the success of restorative dentistry. This study comprehensively compares the mechanical and esthetic properties of three commonly used dental implant materials: titanium, zirconia, and ceramic. Objective: This study aimed to provide insights into the suitability of titanium, zirconia, and ceramic for various clinical applications within implant dentistry. Methods: Ninety dental implants, 30 for each material, were selected based on their well -established usage in dental implantology. Mechanical properties, including tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and fatigue resistance, were assessed using state-of-the-art testing machines. Esthetic properties, such as color stability and translucency, were scrutinized through immersion in staining solutions and spectrophotometer measurements. Fracture properties and biocompatibility were also evaluated. Results: Mechanical testing revealed that titanium exhibited the highest tensile strength (810 +/- 55 MPa), while zirconia demonstrated the highest modulus of elasticity (208 +/- 8 GPa). Titanium also displayed the greatest fatigue resistance (1,010,000 +/- 95,000 cycles), whereas zirconia had the highest hardness (1190 +/- 45 Vickers hardness number (VHN)). Esthetically, zirconia showed superior color stability ( Delta E: 1.7 +/- 0.2), while ceramic exhibited the highest translucency (TP%: 15.3 +/- 1.7). Zirconia presented the lowest surface roughness (0.28 +/- 0.04 mu m). Conclusion: This study provides insights into potential dental implant material performance, with zirconia emerging as a promising alternative. Future research should validate these findings in clinical settings, considering a broader array of variables and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion
    Al-Radha, Afya Sahib Diab
    Dymock, David
    Younes, Charles
    O'Sullivan, Dominic
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [2] Wear properties of esthetic dental materials against translucent zirconia
    Hayashi, Shota
    Homma, Shinya
    Takanashi, Takuya
    Hirano, Tomoki
    Yoshinari, Masao
    Yajima, Yasutomo
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2019, 38 (02) : 250 - 256
  • [3] A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia
    Osman, Reham B.
    Swain, Michael V.
    MATERIALS, 2015, 8 (03) : 932 - 958
  • [4] Mechanical Properties of Five Esthetic Ceramic Materials Used for Monolithic Restorations: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Almohammed, Saleh N.
    Alshorman, Belal
    Abu-Naba'a, Layla A.
    CERAMICS-SWITZERLAND, 2023, 6 (02): : 1031 - 1049
  • [5] Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains
    Zeng, KY
    Oden, A
    Rowcliffe, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 1998, 11 (02) : 183 - 189
  • [6] Comparative analysis of the wear of titanium/titanium and titanium/zirconia interfaces in implant/abutment assemblies after thermocycling and mechanical loading
    Almeida, Paulo J.
    Silva, Cesar L.
    Alves, Jorge L.
    Silva, Filipe S.
    Martins, Ramiro C.
    Fernandes, Joao Sampaio
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2016, 57 (04): : 207 - 214
  • [7] Processing and mechanical properties of autogenous titanium implant materials
    C. E. Wen
    Y. Yamada
    K. Shimojima
    Y. Chino
    T. Asahina
    M. Mabuchi
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2002, 13 : 397 - 401
  • [8] Processing and mechanical properties of autogenous titanium implant materials
    Wen, CE
    Yamada, Y
    Shimojima, K
    Chino, Y
    Asahina, T
    Mabuchi, M
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 13 (04) : 397 - 401
  • [9] Mechanical properties and microstructure of mullite modified zirconia ceramic for dental applications
    Gao, Limin
    Li, Jing
    Li, Ying
    Zhang, Fuqiang
    JOURNAL OF CERAMIC PROCESSING RESEARCH, 2011, 12 (06): : 640 - 645
  • [10] Esthetic evaluation of single implant-supported prostheses: Comparative analysis of the reliability of the esthetic indices
    Hamdane, Khaireddine
    Nasri, Wafa
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (04) : 680 - 688