Overall Survival and Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Kesireddy, Meghana [1 ]
Elsayed, Lina [1 ]
Shostrom, Valerie K. [2 ]
Agarwal, Priyal [1 ]
Asif, Samia [1 ]
Yellala, Amulya [1 ]
Krishnamurthy, Jairam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
关键词
metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; overall survival; prognostic factors; national cancer database; demographic factors; clinicopathological factors; treatment factors; cox proportional hazard model; multivariate analysis; OUTCOMES; EXPRESSION; PHENOTYPE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16101791
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive cancer with an average survival of 8 to 13 months. However, survival varies significantly among patients. We studied a large group of women in the National Cancer Database to better understand these survival differences. We found that the key factors influencing survival were comorbidity score (overall health status), histology (cancer subtype), number of metastatic sites (extent of cancer spread), and whether or not they received chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Our study's findings can help better predict survival based on an individual's specific factors and guide treatment strategies.Abstract Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive with poor median overall survival (OS) ranging from 8 to 13 months. There exists considerable heterogeneity in survival at the individual patient level. To better understand the survival heterogeneity and improve risk stratification, our study aims to identify the factors influencing survival, utilizing a large patient sample from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Women diagnosed with metastatic TNBC from 2010 to 2020 in the NCDB were included. Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment data and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate OS. The log-rank test was used to identify OS differences between groups for each variable in the univariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazard model with backward elimination was used to identify factors affecting OS. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Results: In this sample, 2273 women had a median overall survival of 13.6 months. Factors associated with statistically significantly worse OS included older age, higher comorbidity scores, specific histologies, higher number of metastatic sites, presence of liver or other site metastases in those with only one metastatic site (excluding brain metastases), presence of cranial and extra-cranial metastases, lack of chemotherapy, lack of immunotherapy, lack of surgery to distant sites, lack of radiation to distant sites, and receipt of palliative treatment to alleviate symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, comorbidity score, histology, number of metastatic sites, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy had a statistically significant effect on OS. Conclusions: Through NCDB analysis, we have identified prognostic factors for metastatic TNBC. These findings will help individualize prognostication at diagnosis, optimize treatment strategies, and facilitate patient stratification in future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of treatment interruptions on overall survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Chow, Ronald
    Hasan, Shaakir
    Choi, J. Isabelle
    Fox, Jana
    Chhabra, Arpit M.
    Marshall, Deborah C.
    Bakst, Richard L.
    Simone II, Charles B.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 115 (09): : 1029 - 1035
  • [22] A reliable nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Ma, M. W.
    Jing, N.
    Gao, S. X.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [23] A Reliable Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Ma, M.
    Gao, X. S.
    Jing, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E602 - E602
  • [24] Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer
    Li, Xiaoxian
    Yang, Jing
    Peng, Limin
    Sahin, Aysegul A.
    Huo, Lei
    Ward, Kevin C.
    O'Regan, Ruth
    Torres, Mylin A.
    Meisel, Jane L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 161 (02) : 279 - 287
  • [25] Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer
    Xiaoxian Li
    Jing Yang
    Limin Peng
    Aysegul A. Sahin
    Lei Huo
    Kevin C. Ward
    Ruth O’Regan
    Mylin A. Torres
    Jane L. Meisel
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 161 : 279 - 287
  • [26] Efficacy and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer
    Feng Ding
    Ru-Yue Chen
    Jun Hou
    Jing Guo
    Tian-Yi Dong
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, 10 (12) : 3698 - 3708
  • [27] Efficacy and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer
    Ding, Feng
    Chen, Ru-Yue
    Hou, Jun
    Guo, Jing
    Dong, Tian-Yi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (12) : 3698 - 3708
  • [28] Features of triple-negative breast cancer: Analysis of 38,813 cases from the national cancer database
    Plasilova, Magdalena L.
    Hayse, Brandon
    Killelea, Brigid K.
    Horowitz, Nina R.
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    Lannin, Donald R.
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (35)
  • [29] Pembrolizumab monotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Amir, Eitan
    Cescon, David W.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (04): : 415 - 417
  • [30] Atezolizumab in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Perez-Garcia, Jose
    Soberino, Jesus
    Racca, Fabricio
    Gion, Maria
    Stradella, Agostina
    Cortes, Javier
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2020, 20 (09) : 981 - 989