Forecasting the River Water Discharge by Artificial Intelligence Methods

被引:6
作者
Barbulescu, Alina [1 ]
Zhen, Liu [2 ]
机构
[1] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Civil Engn, 5 Turnului St, Brasov 500152, Romania
[2] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Geosci, Natl Key Lab Deep Oil & Gas, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
river discharge; BPNN; ELM; LSTM; EXTREME LEARNING-MACHINE; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; MODELS; REGIME;
D O I
10.3390/w16091248
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The management of water resources must be based on accurate models of the river discharge in the context of the water flow alteration due to anthropic influences and climate change. Therefore, this article addresses the challenge of detecting the best model among three artificial intelligence techniques (AI)-backpropagation neural networks (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and extreme learning machine (ELM)-for the monthly data series discharge of the Buz & abreve;u River, in Romania. The models were built for three periods: January 1955-September 2006 (S1 series), January 1955-December 1983 (S2 series), and January 1984-December 2010 (S series). In terms of mean absolute error (MAE), the best performances were those of ELM on both Training and Test sets on S2, with MAETraining = 5.02 and MAETest = 4.01. With respect to MSE, the best was LSTM on the Training set of S2 (MSE = 60.07) and ELM on the Test set of S2 (MSE = 32.21). Accounting for the R2 value, the best model was LSTM on S2 (R2Training = 99.92%, and R2Test = 99.97%). ELM was the fastest, with 0.6996 s, 0.7449 s, and 0.6467 s, on S, S1, and S2, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [31] Hochreiter S, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P1735, DOI [10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2, 10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1]
  • [32] Huang GB, 2004, IEEE IJCNN, P985
  • [33] Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications
    Huang, Guang-Bin
    Zhu, Qin-Yu
    Siew, Chee-Kheong
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2006, 70 (1-3) : 489 - 501
  • [34] DeepGR4J: A deep learning hybridization approach for conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling
    Kapoor, Arpit
    Pathiraja, Sahani
    Marshall, Lucy
    Chandra, Rohitash
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2023, 169
  • [35] Karlsson V., Extreme Kernel Machine
  • [36] Khan Firdos, 2018, International Journal of Water, V12, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJW.2018.090184
  • [37] Neural network model for discharge and water-level prediction for Ramganga River catchment of Ganga Basin, India
    Khan, M. Y. A.
    Hasan, F.
    Panwar, S.
    Chakrapani, G. J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2016, 61 (11): : 2084 - 2095
  • [38] Modeling River Stage-Discharge Relationships Using Different Neural Network Computing Techniques
    Kisi, Oezguer
    Cobaner, Murat
    [J]. CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2009, 37 (02) : 160 - 169
  • [39] Toward Improved Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Exploiting the Power of Machine Learning
    Kratzert, Frederik
    Klotz, Daniel
    Herrnegger, Mathew
    Sampson, Alden K.
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    Nearing, Grey S.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (12) : 11344 - 11354
  • [40] Rainfall-runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks
    Kratzert, Frederik
    Klotz, Daniel
    Brenner, Claire
    Schulz, Karsten
    Herrnegger, Mathew
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (11) : 6005 - 6022