Nonlinear finite element and machine learning modeling of tubed reinforced concrete columns under eccentric axial compression loading

被引:21
作者
Isleem, Haytham F. [1 ]
Chukka, Naga Dheeraj Kumar Reddy [2 ]
Bahrami, Alireza [3 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [4 ]
Sor, Nadhim Hamah [5 ]
机构
[1] Qujing Normal Univ, Sch Appl Technol, Qujing 655011, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Aditya Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Surampalem, India
[3] Univ Gavle, Fac Engn & Sustainable Dev, Dept Bldg Engn Energy Syst & Sustainabil Sci, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden
[4] Natl Inst Technol Patna, Dept Civil Engn, Patna, India
[5] Univ Garmian, Dept Civil Engn, Kalar 46021, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
关键词
Finite element method; Tubed-reinforced concrete column; Reinforced concrete; Machine learning; Ductility; Compression performance; Eccentric loading; STRESS-STRAIN MODEL; CONFINED CONCRETE; STUB COLUMNS; STEEL; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2024.02.026
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
There is still insufficient data on the behavior of tubed-reinforced concrete columns (TRCCs) under the eccentric compression. Thus, this research work comprehensively examines the eccentric compression behavior of TRCCs using nonlinear finite element modeling and machine learning (ML). To do this, numerical simulation and parametric analysis based on existing investigations were conducted. In addition to the existing 22 specimens with limited test variables, additional 188 specimens were developed to cover a wide range of parameters, including the load eccentricity, transverse reinforcement spacing, columns ' slenderness ratio, yield strength of steel, and outer steel tube diameter. Additionally, six ML models were created to estimate the ultimate load results. The results indicated that increasing the outer steel tube yield strength and diameter, and reducing the load eccentricity, slenderness ratio, and spacing of the transverse reinforcement enhanced the load-carrying capacity of the columns. The Gaussian process regression model demonstrated superior performance metrics in comparison to other ML models, with the highest R 2 values (0.998613 in training and 0.99823 in testing stages) and lowest root mean square error values (0.007213 in training and 0.008471 in testing stages). To save money, time, and resources compared to laboratory testing, an online-based prediction program is finally presented to predict the columns ' ultimate load.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 416
页数:37
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Shear strength and behavior of tubed reinforced and steel reinforced concrete (TRC and TSRC) short columns [J].
Abdullah, Jasim Ali ;
Zhang Sumei ;
Liu Jiepeng .
THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2010, 48 (03) :191-199
[2]  
Aboutaha RS, 1998, STRUCT DES TALL BUIL, V7, P251
[3]  
Aghamaleki ST., 2022, J Struct Constr Eng, V9, P66, DOI [10.22065/JSCE.2021.301313.2546, DOI 10.22065/JSCE.2021.301313.2546]
[4]   Nonlinear behaviour of corrosion damaged low-strength short reinforced concrete columns under compressive axial cyclic loading [J].
Aminulai, Hammed O. ;
Robinson, Andrew F. ;
Ferguson, Neil S. ;
Kashani, Mohammed M. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 289
[5]   Improving the prediction of petroleum reservoir characterization with a stacked generalization ensemble model of support vector machines [J].
Anifowose, Fatai ;
Labadin, Jane ;
Abdulraheem, Abdulazeez .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 26 :483-496
[6]   Stress-strain model for concrete under cyclic loading [J].
Aslani, Farhad ;
Jowkarmeimandi, Raha .
MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (08) :673-685
[7]   Behavior of concentrically loaded high performance concrete tied columns [J].
Awati, Mahesh ;
Khadiranaikar, R. B. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 37 :76-87
[8]  
Bahrami A., 2020, J. Appl. Eng. Sci., V18, P591, DOI [10.5937/jaes0-25497, DOI 10.5937/JAES0-25497]
[9]  
BAHRAMI A., 2020, Civil engineering and architecture, V8, P1119
[10]   Machine learning based prediction model for plastic hinge length calculation of reinforced concrete structural walls [J].
Barkhordari, Mohammad Sadegh ;
Jawdhari, Akram .
ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (09) :1714-1734