Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race

被引:0
作者
Hjortskov, Morten [1 ]
Andersen, Simon Calmar [2 ]
机构
[1] VIVE Danish Ctr Social Sci Res, Dept Children & Educ, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
candidates; voters; conjoint; gender; race; VOTING-BEHAVIOR; STEREOTYPES; INFORMATION; ECONOMICS; IDEOLOGY; SUPPORT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123424000048
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed. We suggest voters have lexicographic preferences, meaning they rank their preferences and focus primarily on the candidate's party affiliation. Second-order preferences such as gender and race are mostly necessary when there is a tie in first-order preferences when voters choose between two same-party candidates or have no party information. We show how conjoint experiments can be used to test for lexicographic preferences and use data from a US-representative sample and a pre-registered replication to confirm that in the United States, gender and race are second-order preferences. Lexicographic preferences provide a theoretical lens explaining some of the mixed results of gender and race in the candidate literature.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / 1423
页数:20
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments? [J].
Abramson, Scott F. ;
Kocak, Korhan ;
Magazinnik, Asya .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 66 (04) :1008-1020
[2]   Voting for women in nonpartisan and partisan elections [J].
Badas, Alex ;
Stauffer, Katelyn E. .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2019, 57 :245-255
[3]   Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Election Outcomes: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect [J].
Bansak, Kirk ;
Hainmueller, Jens ;
Hopkins, Daniel J. ;
Yamamoto, Teppei .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 31 (04) :500-518
[4]   Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions [J].
Bartels, LM .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 24 (02) :117-150
[5]   Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice [J].
Basinger, SJ ;
Lavine, H .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (02) :169-184
[6]   Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates [J].
Bauer, Nichole M. .
JOURNAL OF WOMEN POLITICS & POLICY, 2018, 39 (01) :1-25
[7]   The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations [J].
Bauer, Nichole M. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (02) :279-295
[8]   Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates [J].
Bauer, Nichole M. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 36 (06) :691-708
[9]   Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments [J].
Campbell, Danny ;
Hutchinson, W. George ;
Scarpa, Riccardo .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 41 (03) :401-417
[10]   WHITE REACTIONS TO BLACK CANDIDATES - WHEN DOES RACE MATTER [J].
CITRIN, J ;
GREEN, DP ;
SEARS, DO .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1990, 54 (01) :74-96