Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Cauda Equina Syndrome Management During Pregnancy

被引:0
作者
Egu, Chinedu [1 ]
Akintunde, Samuel [1 ]
Adekoya, Motunrayo [1 ]
Essiet, Edidiong [1 ]
Komaitis, Spyridon [1 ]
Najjar, Elie [1 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Queens Med Ctr, Ctr Spinal Studies & Surg, Nottingham, England
关键词
spinal surgery; foetal outcome; lumbar disc herniation; cauda equina syndrome; pregnancy; LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION; SYNDROME SECONDARY; CESAREAN DELIVERY; 3RD TRIMESTER; ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT; BACK; SURGERY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.63550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cauda equina during pregnancy represents a rare entity, with data regarding optimal treatment being very scarce in the pertinent literature. Given the scarcity of current evidence on the topic, this study conducts a systematic review and analysis of existing literature concerning cauda equina syndrome (CES) management in pregnant women. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, yielding 26 level IV peer -reviewed articles that met the inclusion criteria. These studies collectively encompassed 30 pregnant patients with CES, with a mean age of 31.2 years and an average gestational age of 26 weeks. Disc herniation emerged as the primary cause in 73% of cases. Regarding surgical interventions, the prone position was utilised in 70% of cases, with 73% receiving general anaesthesia. Notably, third -trimester spinal surgeries exhibited a higher complete recovery rate compared to earlier trimesters. Minimally invasive spinal surgery demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of complete recovery and reduced risk of persistent post -operative symptoms when compared to open approaches. Moreover, patients undergoing caesarean section (CS) after spinal surgery reported higher rates of symptom resolution and lower symptom persistence compared to those with CS before spinal surgery or vaginal delivery post -spinal surgery. Despite these study's findings, the overall evidence base remains limited, precluding definitive conclusions. Consequently, the study underscores the importance of multidisciplinary team discussions to formulate optimal treatment strategies for pregnant individuals presenting with CES. This highlights a critical need for further research to expand the knowledge base and improve the guidance available for managing CES in pregnant populations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Ahern D P, 2018, Ir Med J, V111, P843
[2]   Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation - A meta-analysis of surgical outcomes [J].
Ahn, UM ;
Ahn, NU ;
Buchowski, JM ;
Garrett, ES ;
Sieber, AN ;
Kostuik, JP .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (12) :1515-1522
[3]  
Al-Areibi A, 2007, CAN J ANAESTH, V54, P471, DOI 10.1007/BF03022034
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V117, P420, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820eede9
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Intrapartum care.
[6]  
Anton Capitan B, 2017, Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, V61, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.004
[7]   Lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy: a review on general management and timing of surgery [J].
Ardaillon, Hugo ;
Laviv, Yosef ;
Arle, Jeffrey E. ;
Kasper, Ekkehard M. .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2018, 160 (07) :1361-1370
[8]   Pregnancy and childbirth after microsurgery for lumbar disc herniation [J].
Berkmann, Sven ;
Fandino, Javier .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2012, 154 (02) :329-334
[9]   Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy [J].
Borg-Stein, J ;
Dugan, SA ;
Gruber, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 84 (03) :180-192
[10]   Lumbar disc excision and cesarean delivery during the same anesthesia - A case report [J].
Brown, MD ;
Brookfield, KF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (09) :2030-2032