Appraisal of rock dynamic, physical, and mechanical properties and forecasting shear wave velocity using machine learning and statistical methods

被引:2
作者
Alenizi, Farhan A. [1 ]
Mohammed, Adil Hussein [2 ]
Alizadeh, S. M. [3 ]
Gohari, Omid Mahdizadeh [4 ]
Motahari, Mohammad Reza [5 ]
机构
[1] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[2] Cihan Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Commun & Comp Engn, Erbil, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[3] Australian Univ, Petr Engn Dept, West Mishref, Kuwait
[4] Isfahan Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Geotech, Esfahan, Iran
[5] Arak Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Arak, Iran
关键词
Dynamic properties; Physical and mechanical properties; Statistical analysis; GPR; FBP-ANN; KNN; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; ELASTIC-MODULUS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; MODEL; PARAMETERS; LIMESTONE; RESERVOIR; BEHAVIOR; LOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105216
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Direct determination of shear wave velocity requires time, cost, and high accuracy due to the complexity of the rock texture. In current research statistical and intelligent approaches have been used to predict the shear wave velocity of rock samples. Also, a new correlation between dynamic and static rock properties was established and the shear wave velocity was estimated based on index tests using Gaussian process regression, multivariate linear regression, feedforward back-propagation artificial neural network, and K-nearest neighbor methods. In total, 120 data related to limestone and sandstone samples of the main projects were used for modeling. Water absorption, compressional wave velocity, and density were used as inputs. The outcomes revealed that the PW/SW ratio is equal to 1.69. Various statistics were used to check the method results. The statistical results showed that it is possible to forecast Ed, and SW with high accuracy. Also, the precision of the GPR was higher than the FBPANN, statistical analysis, and KNN. Estimation of SW by GPR showed R of 0.992, and RMSE of 0.06, respectively. These four methods were able to estimate the SW with a mean variation percentage of +0.19%. It's important to consider that these models are best suited for predicting SW when the predictor indicators fall within the same range as this study.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Forecasting COVID-19 cases using dynamic time warping and incremental machine learning methods
    Miralles-Pechuan, Luis
    Kumar, Ankit
    Suarez-Cetrulo, Andres L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2023, 40 (06)
  • [22] Digital mapping of soil physical and mechanical properties using machine learning at the watershed scale
    Ghavami, Mohammad Sajjad
    Ayoubi, Shamsollah
    Mosaddeghi, Mohammad Reza
    Naimi, Salman
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2023, 20 (10) : 2975 - 2992
  • [23] Estimating Geotechnical Properties of Sedimentary Rocks Based on Physical Parameters and Ultrasonic P-Wave Velocity Using Statistical Methods and Soft Computing Approaches
    Reza Khajevand
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2023, 47 : 3785 - 3809
  • [24] Nondestructive Estimation of Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) Terminal Velocity and Drag Coefficient Based on Some Fruit Physical Properties Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Kabas, Onder
    Kayakus, Mehmet
    Moiceanu, Georgiana
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (15)
  • [25] Prediction of Static Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete from Dynamic Modulus Associated with Wave Velocity and Resonance Frequency Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Park, Jong Yil
    Sim, Sung-Han
    Yoon, Young Geun
    Oh, Tae Keun
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (13) : 1 - 24
  • [26] Mining the relationship between the dynamic compression performance and basic mechanical properties of Ti20C based on machine learning methods
    Gong, Haichao
    Fan, Qunbo
    Xie, Wenqiang
    Zhang, Hongmei
    Yang, Lin
    Xu, Shun
    Cheng, Xingwang
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 226