Evaluation of an automated clinical decision system with deep learning dose prediction and NTCP model for prostate cancer proton therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Mei [1 ]
Pang, Bo [2 ]
Zeng, Yiling [2 ]
Xu, Cheng [1 ]
Chen, Jiayi [1 ]
Yang, Kunyu [3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yu [3 ,4 ]
Yang, Zhiyong [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 20025, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Phys & Technol, Dept Med Phys, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Canc Ctr, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Inst Radiat Oncol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
关键词
normal tissue complication probability; dose prediction; deep learning; proton therapy; patient selection; COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; SELECTION; DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; REDUCTION; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad48f6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the feasibility of using a deep learning dose prediction approach to identify patients who could benefit most from proton therapy based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Approach. Two 3D UNets were established to predict photon and proton doses. A dataset of 95 patients with localized prostate cancer was randomly partitioned into 55, 10, and 30 for training, validation, and testing, respectively. We selected NTCP models for late rectum bleeding and acute urinary urgency of grade 2 or higher to quantify the benefit of proton therapy. Propagated uncertainties of predicted Delta NTCPs resulting from the dose prediction errors were calculated. Patient selection accuracies for a single endpoint and a composite evaluation were assessed under different Delta NTCP thresholds. Main results. Our deep learning-based dose prediction technique can reduce the time spent on plan comparison from approximately 2 days to as little as 5 seconds. The expanded uncertainty of predicted Delta NTCPs for rectum and bladder endpoints propagated from the dose prediction error were 0.0042 and 0.0016, respectively, which is less than one-third of the acceptable tolerance. The averaged selection accuracies for rectum bleeding, urinary urgency, and composite evaluation were 90%, 93.5%, and 93.5%, respectively. Significance. Our study demonstrates that deep learning dose prediction and NTCP evaluation scheme could distinguish the NTCP differences between photon and proton treatment modalities. In addition, the dose prediction uncertainty does not significantly influence the decision accuracy of NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy. Therefore, automated deep learning dose prediction and NTCP evaluation schemes can potentially be used to screen large patient populations and to avoid unnecessary delays in the start of prostate cancer radiotherapy in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison and evaluation of different deep learning models of synthetic CT generation from CBCT for nasopharynx cancer adaptive proton therapy
    Pang, Bo
    Si, Hang
    Liu, Muyu
    Fu, Wensheng
    Zeng, Yiling
    Liu, Hongyuan
    Cao, Ting
    Chang, Yu
    Quan, Hong
    Yang, Zhiyong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (11) : 6920 - 6930
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of a deep learning CBCT auto-segmentation software for prostate adaptive radiation therapy
    Radici, Lorenzo
    Piva, Cristina
    Borca, Valeria Casanova
    Cante, Domenico
    Ferrario, Silvia
    Paolini, Marina
    Cabras, Laura
    Petrucci, Edoardo
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    La Porta, Maria Rosa
    Pasquino, Massimo
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 47
  • [23] Dose Prediction for Prostate Radiation Treatment: Feasibility of a Distance-Based Deep Learning Model
    Tavakoli, Maryam H.
    Ru, Boshu
    Xie, Tianyi
    Hadzikadic, Mirsad
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Ge, Yaorong
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2019, : 2379 - 2386
  • [24] Clinical evaluation of deep learning based synthetic CTs from CBCTs for head-and-neck proton therapy
    Vestergaard, Casper D.
    Elstrom, Ulrik V.
    Muren, Ludvig P.
    Ren, Jintao
    Norrevang, Ole
    Jensen, Kenneth
    Taasti, Vicki T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3898 - S3901
  • [25] Clinical evaluation of a deep learning model for segmentation of target volumes in breast cancer radiotherapy
    Buelens, P.
    Willems, S.
    Vandewinckele, L.
    Crijns, W.
    Maes, F.
    Weltens, C. G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 171 : 84 - 90
  • [26] Deep learning dose prediction for IMRT of esophageal cancer: The effect of data quality and quantity on model performance
    Barragan-Montero, Ana M.
    Thomas, Melissa
    Defraene, Gilles
    Michiels, Steven
    Haustermans, Karin
    Lee, John A.
    Sterpin, Edmond
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 83 : 52 - 63
  • [27] Evaluation of two independent dose prediction methods to personalize the automated radiotherapy planning process for prostate cancer
    Kusters, Martijn
    Miki, Kentaro
    Bouwmans, Liza
    Bzdusek, Karl
    van Kollenburg, Peter
    Smeenk, Robert Jan
    Monshouwer, Rene
    Nagata, Yasushi
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 24 - 29
  • [28] Quantitative assessment of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using deep learning: Bladder dose as a decision criterion
    Wan, Luping
    Jiang, Yin
    Zhu, Xianggao
    Wu, Hao
    Zhao, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (10) : 6479 - 6489
  • [29] A deep learning model for predicting the modified micro-dosimetric kinetic model-based dose and the dose-averaged linear energy transfer for prostate cancer in carbon ion therapy
    Zhang, Liwen
    Wang, Weiwei
    Li, Ping
    Zhang, Qing
    Han, Rongcheng
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32
  • [30] 3D in vivo dose verification in prostate proton therapy with deep learning-based proton-acoustic imaging
    Jiang, Zhuoran
    Sun, Leshan
    Yao, Weiguang
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Xiang, Liangzhong
    Ren, Lei
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (21)