Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks

被引:1
|
作者
Rennie, Olivia [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Manaswi [1 ]
Helwa, Nour [1 ]
机构
[1] FluidAI Med, Dept Clin Affairs, Kitchener, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
anastomosis; anastomotic leak; colorectal surgery; definitions; grading systems; complications; consequences; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RISK-FACTORS; CURATIVE RESECTION; CANCER SURGERY; COLONIC-CANCER; MORTALITY; MORBIDITY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2024.1371567
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are a significant and feared postoperative complication, with incidence of up to 30% despite advances in surgical techniques. With implications such as additional interventions, prolonged hospital stays, and hospital readmission, ALs have important impacts at the level of individual patients and healthcare providers, as well as healthcare systems as a whole. Challenges in developing unified definitions and grading systems for leaks have proved problematic, despite acknowledgement that colorectal AL is a critical issue in intestinal surgery with serious consequences. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs, and consequences of this postoperative complication.Methods A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following keywords: anastomosis, anastomotic leak, colorectal, surgery, grading system, complications, risk factors, and consequences. Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included.Results A universally accepted definition and grading system for ALs continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Additional factors add to variability in estimates, including differences in the anastomotic site and institutional/individual differences in operative technique. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading AL, with the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC/ISREC) definition the current most recommended universal definition for colorectal AL. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others.Conclusions Colorectal AL remains a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Espin-Basany, E.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2018, 22 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [22] Reducing Anastomotic Leakage in Oncologic Colorectal Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review
    Boccola, Mark A.
    Lin, Joshua
    Rozen, Warren M.
    Ho, Yik-Hong
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (02) : 601 - 607
  • [23] Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature
    Daams, Freek
    Wu, Zhouqiao
    Lahaye, Max Jef
    Jeekel, Johannus
    Lange, Johan Frederik
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 6 (02): : 14 - 26
  • [24] Preventive strategies for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resections: A review
    Mostafa Shalaby
    Waleed Thabet
    Mosaad Morshed
    Mohamed Farid
    Pierpaolo Sileri
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2019, (08) : 389 - 398
  • [25] The assessment of intraoperative technique-related risk factors and the treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a narrative review
    Chen, Chuangui
    Jiang, Hongjing
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01) : 207 - 215
  • [26] Systematic review on the value of CT scanning in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery
    Kornmann, Verena N. N.
    Treskes, Nikki
    Hoonhout, Lilian H. F.
    Bollen, Thomas L.
    van Ramshorst, Bert
    Boerma, Djamila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 28 (04) : 437 - 445
  • [27] Endoscopic management of complications-Ovesco/stent for management of anastomotic leaks: a narrative review
    Guedes, Hugo Goncalo
    de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux
    ANNALS OF ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 5 : 1 - 8
  • [28] Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage:A review
    Annelien N Morks
    Klaas Havenga
    Rutger J Ploeg
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (40) : 4461 - 4469
  • [29] Using preoperative C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leaks and other complications after elective colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Cloutier, Zacharie
    Archer, Vicki
    Park, Lily
    Lee, Jay
    Heimann, Luke
    Patel, Ashaka
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 26 (06) : 1114 - 1130
  • [30] Surgical management of anastomotic leakage related to ovarian cancer surgery: a narrative review
    Restaino, Stefano
    Schierano, Sofia
    Arcieri, Martina
    Costantini, Barbara
    Poli, Alice
    Pregnolato, Sara
    Terrosu, Giovanni
    Calandra, Sergio
    Petrillo, Marco
    Pellecchia, Giulia
    Lucidi, Alessandro
    Klaric, Marko
    Driul, Lorenza
    Chiantera, Vito
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    Taliento, Cristina
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11