Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks

被引:1
|
作者
Rennie, Olivia [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Manaswi [1 ]
Helwa, Nour [1 ]
机构
[1] FluidAI Med, Dept Clin Affairs, Kitchener, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
anastomosis; anastomotic leak; colorectal surgery; definitions; grading systems; complications; consequences; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RISK-FACTORS; CURATIVE RESECTION; CANCER SURGERY; COLONIC-CANCER; MORTALITY; MORBIDITY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2024.1371567
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are a significant and feared postoperative complication, with incidence of up to 30% despite advances in surgical techniques. With implications such as additional interventions, prolonged hospital stays, and hospital readmission, ALs have important impacts at the level of individual patients and healthcare providers, as well as healthcare systems as a whole. Challenges in developing unified definitions and grading systems for leaks have proved problematic, despite acknowledgement that colorectal AL is a critical issue in intestinal surgery with serious consequences. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs, and consequences of this postoperative complication.Methods A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following keywords: anastomosis, anastomotic leak, colorectal, surgery, grading system, complications, risk factors, and consequences. Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included.Results A universally accepted definition and grading system for ALs continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Additional factors add to variability in estimates, including differences in the anastomotic site and institutional/individual differences in operative technique. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading AL, with the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC/ISREC) definition the current most recommended universal definition for colorectal AL. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others.Conclusions Colorectal AL remains a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Hepatobiliary anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks
    Rennie, Olivia
    Sharma, Manaswi
    Helwa, Nour
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 9
  • [2] Factors Contributing to Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Surgery: Why, When, and Who Leaks?
    Sripathi, Shravani
    Khan, Mashal I.
    Patel, Naomi
    Meda, Roja T.
    Nuguru, Surya P.
    Rachakonda, Sriker
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [3] Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery
    Gessler, Bodil
    Eriksson, Olle
    Angenete, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (04) : 549 - 556
  • [4] Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review
    Gielen, Anke
    Heuvelings, Danique
    Sylla, Patricia
    van Loon, Yu-Ting
    Melenhorst, Jarno
    Bouvy, Nicole
    Kimman, Merel
    Breukink, Stephanie
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2025, 68 (02) : 154 - 170
  • [5] Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery
    Hirst, N. A.
    Tiernan, J. P.
    Millner, P. A.
    Jayne, D. G.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (02) : 95 - 109
  • [6] Collagenase-producing bacteria are common in anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a systematic review
    Jorgensen, Anders Bech
    Jonsson, Isabella
    Friis-Hansen, Lennart
    Brandstrup, Birgitte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [7] Peritoneal fluid biomarkers in the detection of colorectal anastomotic leaks: a systematic review
    Wright, Emma C.
    Connolly, Patricia
    Vella, Mark
    Moug, Susan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (07) : 935 - 945
  • [8] Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pommergaard, H. -C.
    Gessler, B.
    Burcharth, J.
    Angenete, E.
    Haglind, E.
    Rosenberg, J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (09) : 662 - 671
  • [9] Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: A review
    Morks, Annelien N.
    Havenga, Klaas
    Ploeg, Rutger J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (40) : 4461 - 4469
  • [10] Effectiveness of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation on anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leenen, Jobbe P. L.
    Hentzen, Judith E. K. R.
    Ockhuijsen, Henrietta D. L.
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2019, 71 (02) : 227 - 236