Optimal resources allocation to support the consensus reaching in group decision making

被引:14
作者
Fan, Sha [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Haiming [1 ,2 ]
Li, Cong-Cong [3 ]
Chiclana, Francisco [4 ,5 ]
Pedrycz, Witold [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Dong, Yucheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Xiangjiang Lab, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[4] De Montfort Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligence, Leicester, England
[5] De Montfort Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Leicester, England
[6] Univ Alberta, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
[7] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Syst Engn, Taipa 999078, Macao, Peoples R China
[8] Istinye Univ, Res Ctr Performance & Prod Anal, Istanbul, Turkiye
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision and negotiation; Consensus; Resources allocation; Utility function; Decision support; MINIMUM-COST; UTILITY FUNCTION; MAXIMUM-RETURN; MODELS; ADJUSTMENT; OPERATORS; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102451
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In group decision making (GDM), the minimum cost consensus model (MCCM) to assist a group to reach a consensus with the minimum cost has gained widespread attention. However, determining the unit costs for adjusting decision makers' opinions in the MCCM is a challenging problem that limits its practical applications. Meanwhile, the MCCM is not modeled as a resources allocation problem in an explicit manner, and the opinions in the MCCM do not represent utilities/satisfactions, leading to the unclear implications of opinions' adjustments. To overcome these limitations of the MCCM, this paper proposes the optimal resources allocation consensus model (ORACM) to assist the moderator to allocate resources without determining unit costs to support consensus reaching, through the introduction of the resources allocation problem and utility functions in its modeling. Furthermore, we present a theoretical analysis framework to reveal the properties of the ORACM and the connection between the ORACM and the MCCM, justifying the theoretical advantages of the ORACM. Moreover, the ORACM is applied to the transboundary river pollution control negotiations of Sichuan's Tuojiang River, and the effectiveness and feasibility of the ORACM are further validated with detailed simulation and comparison analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[2]   UTILITY FUNCTION FOR TIME STREAMS HAVING INTER-PERIOD DEPENDENCIES [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1977, 25 (03) :448-458
[3]   Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity [J].
Ben-Arieh, D. ;
Easton, T. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2007, 43 (03) :713-721
[4]   Minimum Cost Consensus With Quadratic Cost Functions [J].
Ben-Arieh, David ;
Easton, Todd ;
Evans, Brandon .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2009, 39 (01) :210-217
[5]  
Berger J. O., 1985, Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis
[6]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[7]  
Boyd S., 2004, Convex Optimization
[8]  
Brams SJ, 2009, STUD CHOICE WELF, P215, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-79128-7_12
[9]   Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context [J].
Cheng, Dong ;
Zhou, Zhili ;
Cheng, Faxin ;
Zhou, Yanfang ;
Xie, Yujing .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 270 (03) :1122-1137
[10]   Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. ;
Alonso, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :383-399