Environmental and economic tradeoffs of green hydrogen production via water electrolysis with a focus on carbon mitigation: A provincial level study in China

被引:17
作者
Du, Lifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, Ling [4 ]
Yang, Yanmei [4 ]
Li, Jiaquan [5 ]
Xu, Shuo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yunlong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Luli [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] China Natl Inst Standardizat, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green hydrogen; Carbon mitigation; Environmental -economic tradeoff; Time -space scenario analysis; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POWER-TO-GAS; ENERGY-STORAGE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COST; ELECTRICITY; CONSEQUENCES; REDUCTION; BARRIERS; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.318
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Clean (green) hydrogen can be generated via water electrolysis using photovoltaic, wind, hydropower, or decarbonized grid electricity. However, there is a lack of environmental and economic trade-offs for alternative production in the low-carbon transition. This study presents an assessment framework for analyzing the environmental-economic tradeoff indicators of replacing traditional hydrogen production pathways with green alternatives, with an illustrative example drawn from the baseline scenario in which green hydrogen replaces coal for hydrogen production in China. The production system for green hydrogen in China will be competitive with traditional methods by 2030, leading to a significant transition. The priority order of the renewable energy technology portfolio for hydrogen production via water electrolysis is PV-ALK > WP-ALK > WP-PEM > PV-PEM. Regions with high trade-off indicators have the comprehensive benefit of promoting green hydrogen substitution, and Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Hebei, and Xinjiang have lower decarbonization costs and can obtain better abatement benefits. The system of trade-off indicators from the perspective of emission reduction can guide the selection of green hydrogen production technologies and project planning and will be further improved.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 340
页数:15
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Green hydrogen characterisation initiatives: Definitions, standards, guarantees of origin, and challenges [J].
Abad, Anthony Velazquez ;
Dodds, Paul E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 138
[2]   Decarbonization of fossil fuels as a strategy to control global warming [J].
Abbasi, Tasneem ;
Abbasi, S. A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (04) :1828-1834
[3]   Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 :835-849
[4]   Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) :1-12
[5]  
Albrecht U., 2020, INTERNATIONAL HYDROGEN STRATEGIES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Global Hydrogen Review 2022, DOI DOI 10.1787/A15B8442-EN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, INT ENERGY AGENCY, P224
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, An Energy Sector Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality in China
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2022, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Greenhouse gases - Carbon footprint of products - Requirements and guidelines for quantification ISO 14067