Prediction of high-risk prostate cancer based on the habitat features of biparametric magnetic resonance and the omics features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

被引:0
作者
Huang, Fangyi [1 ]
Huang, Qun [1 ]
Liao, Xinhong [1 ]
Gao, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Ultrasound, 6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Habitat imaging; Omics features; Bp-MRI; CEUS; Prostate cancer; RADIOMICS; DIAGNOSIS; MRI; HETEROGENEITY; EVOLUTION; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37955
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Rationale and objectives: To predict high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) by combining the habitat features of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) with the omics features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Materials and methods: This study retrospectively collected patients with PCa confirmed by histopathology from January 2020 to June 2023. All patients underwent bp-MRI and CEUS of the prostate, followed by a targeted and transrectal systematic prostate biopsy. The cases were divided into the intermediate-low-risk group (Gleason score <= 7, n = 59) and high-risk group (Gleason score >= 8, n = 33). Radiomics prediction models, namely, MRI_habitat, CEUS_intra, and MRI-CEUS models, were developed based on the habitat features of bp-MRI, the omics features of CEUS, and a merge of features of the two, respectively. Predicted probabilities, called radscores, were then obtained. Clinical-radiological indicators were screened to construct clinic models, which generated clinic scores. The omics-clinic model was constructed by combining the radscore of MRI-CEUS and the clinic score. The predictive performance of all the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) values of the MRI-CEUS model were 0.875 and 0.842 in the training set and test set, respectively, which were higher than those of the MR_habitat (training set: 0.846, test set: 0.813), CEUS_intra (training set: 0.801, test set: 0.743), and clinic models (training set: 0.722, test set: 0.611). The omics-clinic model achieved a higher AUC (train set: 0.986, test set: 0.898).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review [J].
Bergengren, Oskar ;
Pekala, Kelly R. ;
Matsoukas, Konstantina ;
Fainberg, Jonathan ;
Mungovan, Sean F. ;
Bratt, Ola ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Brawley, Otis ;
Luckenbaugh, Amy N. ;
Mucci, Lorelei ;
Morgan, Todd M. ;
Carlsson, Sigrid, V .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 84 (02) :191-206
[2]   Using fMRI non-local means denoising to uncover activation in sub-cortical structures at 1.5 T for guided HARDI tractography [J].
Bernier, Michael ;
Chamberland, Maxime ;
Houde, Jean-Christophe ;
Descoteaux, Maxime ;
Whittingstall, Kevin .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
[3]   Radiomic and Genomic Machine Learning Method Performance for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Literature Review [J].
Castaldo, Rossana ;
Cavaliere, Carlo ;
Soricelli, Andrea ;
Salvatore, Marco ;
Pecchia, Leandro ;
Franzese, Monica .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04)
[4]   MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI [J].
Chen, Tong ;
Zhang, Zhiyuan ;
Tan, Shuangxiu ;
Zhang, Yueyue ;
Wei, Chaogang ;
Wang, Shan ;
Zhao, Wenlu ;
Qian, Xusheng ;
Zhou, Zhiyong ;
Shen, Junkang ;
Dai, Yakang ;
Hu, Jisu .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
[5]   MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know [J].
Das, Chandan J. ;
Netaji, Arjunlokesh ;
Razik, Abdul ;
Verma, Sadhna .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (09) :1087-1094
[6]   Microenvironmental regulation of tumour angiogenesis [J].
de Palma, Michele ;
Biziato, Daniela ;
Petrova, Tatiana V. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2017, 17 (08) :457-474
[7]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA [J].
De Visschere, P. ;
Lumen, N. ;
Ost, P. ;
Decaestecker, K. ;
Pattyn, E. ;
Villeirs, G. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) :23-32
[8]   Prostate cancer detection and complications of MRI-targeted prostate biopsy using cognitive registration, software-assisted image fusion or in-bore guidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies [J].
Falagario, Ugo Giovanni ;
Pellegrino, Francesco ;
Fanelli, Antonio ;
Guzzi, Francesco ;
Bartoletti, Riccardo ;
Cash, Hannes ;
Pavlovich, Christian ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Carrieri, Giuseppe ;
Giannarini, Gianluca .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2025, 28 (02) :270-279
[9]   Nomogram based on radiomics analysis of primary breast cancer ultrasound images: prediction of axillary lymph node tumor burden in patients [J].
Gao, Yuanjing ;
Luo, Yanwen ;
Zhao, Chenyang ;
Xiao, Mengsu ;
Ma, Li ;
Li, Wenbo ;
Qin, Jing ;
Zhu, Qingli ;
Jiang, Yuxin .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) :928-937
[10]   Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Evolution and Ecology [J].
Gatenby, Robert A. ;
Grove, Olya ;
Gillies, Robert J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (01) :8-15