The response mechanism and testing method of the rock elastic modulus while drilling

被引:2
作者
Jiang, Bei [1 ]
Ma, Fenglin [1 ]
Gao, Hongke [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Songlin [1 ]
Zhang, Chong [2 ]
Bian, Zhenguo [1 ]
Liu, Guangjie [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, State Key Lab Tunnel Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Geotech & Struct Engn Res Ctr, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital drilling; cutting energy density; elastic modulus; inversion model; measurement method; DEFORMATION MODULUS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; INTACT ROCKS; PREDICTION; MODEL; MASS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1080/19475705.2024.2354498
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The elastic modulus is a basic parameter reflecting the deformation resistance and energy concentration characteristics of rock. The traditional testing method of the rock elastic modulus needs to core the surrounding rock and testing it in the laboratory, which has difficulty reflecting the rock mechanical properties under the engineering site environment, and uncontrolled broken surrounding rock is difficult to core for testing. Digital drilling technology provides a new idea for in situ testing of the rock's elastic modulus. The key is to establish a quantitative relationship between the elastic modulus and drilling data. In this paper, the relationship between rock cutting energy density and drilling data is established, and a series of rock digital drilling tests are carried out. The response law of the drilling data and cutting energy density to the rock elastic modulus is clarified. The inversion model of the rock elastic modulus while drilling (DP-E model) is established. The verification test results indicate that the average difference rate of the test results based on the DP-E model is 7.06% compared with the compression test method, which verifies the effectiveness of the model. This study provides a theoretical basis for in situ testing of the rock elastic modulus.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Estimating the Elastic Modulus of Reservoir Rock by Petrophysical Information Using the Geostatistical Method [J].
Abdideh, M. ;
Ghasemi, A. ;
Shahbazi, K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2014, 36 (18) :2062-2069
[2]   A Comparison of Various Statistical and Geostatistical Methods in Estimating the Geomechanical Properties of Reservoir Rocks [J].
Abdideh, M. ;
Ghasemi, A. .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 32 (09) :1058-1064
[3]   Characterizing rock mass deformation mechanisms during plate load tests at the Bakhtiary dam project [J].
Agharazi, Alireza ;
Tannant, DwayneD. ;
Martin, C. Derek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2012, 49 :1-11
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Rock Mechanics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1950, Ann lInstitut Tech Btiment Travaux Public
[6]   The Effect of Effective Pressure on the Relationship Between Static and Dynamic Young's Moduli and Poisson's Ratio of Naparima Hill Formation Mudstones [J].
Blake, O. O. ;
Ramsook, R. ;
Faulkner, D. R. ;
Iyare, U. C. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (08) :3761-3778
[7]  
Brown E.T., 1981, Rock characterization, Testing and monitoring, ISRM suggested methods
[8]   Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system [J].
Cai, M ;
Kaiser, PK ;
Uno, H ;
Tasaka, Y ;
Minami, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2004, 41 (01) :3-19
[9]  
Carmine T., 2022, Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, V130, P104756
[10]   Regional seismic landslide susceptibility assessment considering the rock mass strength heterogeneity [J].
Chen, Shuai ;
Wu, Lixin ;
Miao, Zelang .
GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2023, 14 (01) :1-27