Patches in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Systematic Review

被引:3
作者
Saxena, Amulya K. [1 ]
Hayward, Romilly K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Paediat Surg, London, England
关键词
congenital diaphragmatic hernia; prosthetic materials; recurrence; patch repair; biomaterials; MINIMALLY INVASIVE REPAIR; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; PROSTHETIC PATCH; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; MUSCLE FLAP; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; THORACOSCOPIC REPAIR; RECURRENCE RATE; DEFECT SIZE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006256
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate current choices in practice and outcomes of biomaterials used in patch repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Background: Multiple biomaterials, both novel and combinations of pre-existing materials are employed in patch repair of large size CDHs. Methods: A literature search was performed across Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Publications that explicitly reported patch repair, material used, and recurrences following CDH repair were selected. Results: Sixty-three papers were included, presenting data on 4595 patients, of which 1803 (39.2%) were managed using 19 types of patches. Goretex (R) (GTX) (n=1106) was the most frequently employed patch followed by Dualmesh (R) (n=267), Surgisis (R) (n=156), Marlex (R)/GTX (R) (n=56), Tutoplast dura (R) (n=40), Dacron (R) (n=34), Dacron (R)/GTX (R) (n=32), Permacol (R) (n=24), Teflon (R) (n=24), Surgisis (R)/GTX (R) (n=15), Sauvage (R) Filamentous Fabric (n=13), Marlex (R) (n=9), Alloderm (R) (n=8), Silastic (R) (n=4), Collagen coated Vicryl (R) mesh (CCVM) (n=1), Mersilene (R) (n=1), and MatriStem (R) (n=1) Biomaterials were further subgrouped as: synthetic nonresorbable (SNOR) (n=1458), natural resorbable (NR) (n=241), combined natural and synthetic nonresorbable (NSNOR) (n=103), and combined natural and synthetic resorbable (NSR) (n=1). The overall recurrence rate for patch repair was 16.6% (n=299). For patch types with n>20, recurrence rate was lowest in GTX/Marlex (3.6%), followed by Teflon (4.2%), Dacron (5.6%), Dualmesh (12.4%), GTX (14.8%), Permacol (16.0%), Tutoplast Dura (17.5%), SIS/GTX (26.7%), SIS (34.6%), and Dacron/GTX (37.5%).When analyzed by biomaterial groups, recurrence was highest in NSR (100%), followed by NR (31.5%), NSNOR (17.5%), and SNOR the least (14.0%) Conclusion: In this cohort, over one-third of CDH were closed using patches. To date, 19 patch types/variations have been employed for CDH closure. GTX is the most popular, employed in over 60% of patients; however, excluding smaller cohorts (n<20), GTX/Marlex is associated with the lowest recurrence rate (3.6%). SNOR was the material type least associated with recurrence, while NSR experienced recurrence in every instance.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 234
页数:6
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [61] Surgical perspectives regarding application of biomaterials for the management of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects
    Saxena, Amulya K.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (05) : 475 - 489
  • [62] Minimally invasive congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a 7-year review of one institution's experience
    Shah, Sohail R.
    Wishnew, Jessica
    Barsness, Katherine
    Gaines, Barbara A.
    Potoka, Douglas A.
    Gittes, George K.
    Kane, Timothy D.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (06): : 1265 - 1271
  • [63] The SIS extracellular matrix scaffold - preliminary results of use in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair
    Smith, MJ
    Paran, TS
    Quinn, F
    Corbally, MT
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 20 (11-12) : 859 - 862
  • [64] Abdominal complications related to type of repair for congenital diaphragmatic hernia
    St. Peter, Shawn D.
    Valusek, Patricia A.
    Tsao, KuoJen
    Holcomb, George W., III
    Ostlie, Daniel J.
    Snyder, Charles L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 140 (02) : 234 - 236
  • [65] Morgagni hernia repair in children over two decades: Institutional experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis of 296 patients
    Tan, Yew-Wei
    Banerjee, Debasish
    Cross, Kate M.
    De Coppi, Paolo
    Blackburn, Simon C.
    Rees, Clare M.
    Giuliani, Stefano
    Curry, Joe I.
    Eaton, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (10) : 1883 - 1889
  • [66] Patch repair for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: is it really a problem?
    Tsai, Jacqueline
    Sulkowski, Jason
    Adzick, N. Scott
    Hedrick, Holly L.
    Flake, Alan W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2012, 47 (04) : 637 - 641
  • [67] Long term follow-up in high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors: patching the diaphragm affects the outcome
    Valfre, Laura
    Braguglia, Annabella
    Conforti, Andrea
    Morini, Francesco
    Trucchi, Alessandro
    Iacobelli, Barbara Daniela
    Nahom, Antonella
    Chukhlantseva, Natalia
    Dotta, Andrea
    Corchia, Carlo
    Bagolan, Pietro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2011, 46 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [68] Van Niekerk ML, 2009, S AFR J SURG, V47, P14
  • [69] Chest wall and spinal deformities in adults with congenital diaphragmatic defects
    Vanamo, K
    Peltonen, J
    Rintala, R
    Lindahl, H
    Jaaskelainen, J
    Louhimo, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1996, 31 (06) : 851 - 854
  • [70] Does creating a dome reduce recurrence in congenital diaphragmatic hernia following patch repair
    Verla, Mariatu A.
    Style, Candace C.
    Lee, Timothy C.
    Menchaca, Alicia D.
    Lau, Patricio E.
    Mehollin-Ray, Amy R.
    Fernandes, Caraciolo J.
    Keswani, Sundeep G.
    Olutoye, Oluyinka O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2022, 57 (04) : 637 - 642