Field buried and laboratory investigation of Full-Scale eco-friendly Spun-Cast concrete pipes under various construction loading regimes

被引:4
作者
Faisal, Adeel [1 ,2 ]
Abbas, Safeer [1 ]
Khan, Ammad Hassan [1 ]
Ahmed, Imtisal [1 ]
Shaukat, Sbahat [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Engn & Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Univ Engn & Technol, Civil Engn Dept, Lahore Narowal Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Punjab Intermediate Cities Improvement Investment, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Buried pipes; Vehicular load; Construction equipment; Three -edge test; Patch load; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2024.105813
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Reinforced concrete pipes are widely used under embankments for drainage purposes. Current design and construction guidelines for the reinforced concrete pipes are known to be overly conservative, putting reinforced concrete pipes at a disadvantage against flexible pipes. This study was designed to assess the structural performance of full-scale buried precast concrete pipes with shallow soil cover under the application of vehicular load representing commonly used construction equipment and daily routine vehicles. The concrete pipes incorporating fly ash were reinforced with double cage reinforcement with varying amounts of steel. Various types of vehicles including dump trucks, plain roller, asphalt-filled truck, and transit mixer were passed perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the buried concrete pipe and the vertical displacement at the pipe's crown was monitored. Maximum deflection of 0.26 mm was observed due to the passage of dump truck over the buried pipe. No cracking or sign of distress was observed in the buried pipe under the action of tested vehicular loads. Therefore, pipes were transported to the laboratory and tested under three-edge bearing line load and patch load to mimic the application of wheel load and to investigate the cracking and ultimate capacities. The reduction in the steel reinforcement by 75 % and 50 % resulted in the decrease in the ultimate load capacities of the pipes by 83 % and 57 %, respectively. The 0.3 mm crack load in the patch load test was 0.82 to 0.89 times the 0.3 mm crack load in the three-edge bearing line load test. The 0.3 mm crack load in the laboratory test was around twice the maximum load applied to the pipe in the field buried condition. This study will help designers and contractors to better understand the field and laboratory performance of reinforced eco-friendly concrete pipes buried in shallow soil cover. Moreover, this study acts as a benchmark for evaluating the real field pipe capacities during the construction phase of various infrastructures development.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ACI Committee 318, 2022, ACI CODE-318-19(22)
[2]  
ACPA Concrete Pipe Design Manual, 2011, Concrete Pipe Design Manual.
[3]   A comparative study of the effect of the soil constitutive model on the seismic response of buried concrete pipes [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif .
JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 2 (01) :87-96
[4]   Seismic Seismic response and design of buried concrete pipes subjected to soil loads [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 93
[5]   Economical design of buried concrete pipes subjected to UK standard traffic loading [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif ;
Chapman, David N. ;
Faramarzi, Asaad .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 172 (02) :141-156
[6]   A comparative study of the response of buried pipes under static and moving loads [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif ;
Chapman, David N. ;
Faramarzi, Asaad .
TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2018, 15 :39-46
[7]   Development of a novel model to estimate bedding factors to ensure the economic and robust design of rigid pipes under soil loads [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif ;
Chapman, David N. ;
Faramarzi, Asaad .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 71 :567-578
[8]   The response of buried pipes to UK standard traffic loading [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif ;
Chapman, David ;
Jefferson, Ian ;
Faramarzi, Asaad .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 170 (01) :38-50
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2019, S6-19 Canadian highway bridge design code
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), DOI [10.1520/D2487-17E01, DOI 10.1520/D2487-17E01]