The differential effect of oral and written corrective feedback on learners' explicit versus implicit knowledge

被引:0
作者
Lira-Gonzales, Maria-Lourdes [1 ,4 ]
Nassaji, Hossein [2 ]
De Tejeda, Martha L. [3 ]
Vasquez, Dora [3 ]
Saenz, Kiara [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Mont Laurier, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
[3] Univ San Ignacio Loyola, Lima, Peru
[4] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Educ, 700 Rue Parent, Mont Laurier, PQ J9L2K1, Canada
关键词
explicit knowledge; implicit knowledge; oral corrective feedback; written corrective feedback; INCIDENTAL FOCUS; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; RECASTS; ACCURACY; FORM; SLA;
D O I
10.1177/13621688241248440
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study seeks to address a gap in our understanding of how corrective feedback (CF) influences second language (L2) learning by examining the specific impacts of oral and written CF on acquiring the third person singular -s in the simple present tense. The study examines these effects on both explicit and implicit knowledge. The research was conducted in five intermediate adult English as a second language classrooms in Peru (N = 101), using a pretest-posttest design with one control group (n = 24) and four experimental groups: oral recast (n = 21) oral metalinguistic CF (n = 18) written direct CF (n = 16) and written metalinguistic CF (n = 22). The results revealed no significant difference between oral and written CF; however, differences were observed based on measurement types and CF subtypes used. This study's findings carry theoretical and pedagogical implications, contributing valuable insights to both second language writing research and pedagogy.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [11] Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge
    Ellis, Rod
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2006, 27 (03) : 431 - 463
  • [12] A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback EPILOGUE
    Ellis, Rod
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2010, 32 (02) : 335 - 349
  • [13] Endley M J., 2022, Language Teaching Research Quarterly, V30, P32
  • [14] Ferris D., 2001, J F 2 LANGUAGE WRITI, V10, P161, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X]
  • [15] Ferris D.R., 2006, FEEDBACK 2 LANGUAGE, P81
  • [16] An investigation of meta-linguistic corrective feedback in writing performance
    Gholaminia, Isar
    Gholaminia, Azadeh
    Marzban, Amir
    [J]. 5TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2014, 116 : 316 - 320
  • [17] THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST RECASTS
    Goo, Jaemyung
    Mackey, Alison
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2013, 35 (01) : 127 - 165
  • [18] The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students' writing
    Karim, Khaled
    Nassaji, Hossein
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2020, 24 (04) : 519 - 539
  • [19] Kenworthy Roger., 2006, TESL EJ, V10
  • [20] Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students' perceptions
    Kim, YouJin
    Choi, Bumyong
    Kang, Sanghee
    Kim, Binna
    Yun, Hyunae
    [J]. FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2020, 53 (01) : 176 - 199