The differential effect of oral and written corrective feedback on learners' explicit versus implicit knowledge

被引:0
作者
Lira-Gonzales, Maria-Lourdes [1 ,4 ]
Nassaji, Hossein [2 ]
De Tejeda, Martha L. [3 ]
Vasquez, Dora [3 ]
Saenz, Kiara [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Mont Laurier, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
[3] Univ San Ignacio Loyola, Lima, Peru
[4] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Educ, 700 Rue Parent, Mont Laurier, PQ J9L2K1, Canada
关键词
explicit knowledge; implicit knowledge; oral corrective feedback; written corrective feedback; INCIDENTAL FOCUS; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; RECASTS; ACCURACY; FORM; SLA;
D O I
10.1177/13621688241248440
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study seeks to address a gap in our understanding of how corrective feedback (CF) influences second language (L2) learning by examining the specific impacts of oral and written CF on acquiring the third person singular -s in the simple present tense. The study examines these effects on both explicit and implicit knowledge. The research was conducted in five intermediate adult English as a second language classrooms in Peru (N = 101), using a pretest-posttest design with one control group (n = 24) and four experimental groups: oral recast (n = 21) oral metalinguistic CF (n = 18) written direct CF (n = 16) and written metalinguistic CF (n = 22). The results revealed no significant difference between oral and written CF; however, differences were observed based on measurement types and CF subtypes used. This study's findings carry theoretical and pedagogical implications, contributing valuable insights to both second language writing research and pedagogy.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Al-Rubai'ey F., 2013, Issues in TEFL in the Arab World, P28
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IBM SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation
[3]   The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing [J].
Bitchener, J ;
Young, S ;
Cameron, D .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2005, 14 (03) :191-205
[4]   The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2008, 12 (03) :409-431
[5]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[6]   The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
ELT JOURNAL, 2009, 63 (03) :204-211
[7]   The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[9]   Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar [J].
Ellis, R ;
Loewen, S ;
Erlam, R .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2006, 28 (02) :339-368
[10]   Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language - A psychometric study [J].
Ellis, R .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2005, 27 (02) :141-172