Update to the essential genomic nursing competencies and outcome indicators

被引:8
作者
Calzone, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Stokes, Liz [2 ]
Peterson, Cheryl [3 ]
Badzek, Laurie [4 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Genet Branch, Ctr Canc Res, 37 Convent Dr,Bldg 37,Rm 6002C, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Amer Nurses Assoc, Ctr Eth & Human Rights, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Amer Nurses Assoc, Nursing Programs, Silver Spring, MD USA
[4] Penn State Univ, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
competencies; competency; curriculum; genetics; genomics; nursing education; Pharmacogenetics; pharmacogenomics; HEALTH-CARE; GENETICS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.12993
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
IntroductionGenomic healthcare applications have relevance to all healthcare professionals including nursing, and most evidence-based clinical applications impact the quality and safety of healthcare. To guide nursing genomic competency initiatives, the Essential Nursing Competencies and Curricula Guidelines for Genetics and Genomics were established through a process of consensus in 2005. A 2009 update incorporated outcome indicators consisting of specific areas of knowledge and clinical performance indicators, to help support academic integration. Almost 20 years have elapsed since these competencies were first established, yet incorporating the competencies into general and specialty scope and standards of nursing practice is inconsistent, competency integration into curricula is highly uneven, continuing education in genomics for nurses is limited, and the genomic capacity of the nursing workforce remains low. These deficits have persisted despite substantial advances in genomic technology which substantially reduced costs and increased evidence-based clinical applications, including direct to consumer genomic tests, the integration of genomics into evidence-based guidelines, and evidence that genomics impacts the quality and safety of healthcare.DesignThe aim of this project was to update and achieve consensus on genomic competencies applicable to all registered nurses. This was a mixed methods study.MethodsThe update to the competencies was performed based first on a literature review to update the competencies based on the current state of the evidence. Using the updated content, a modified Delphi study was conducted with registered nurse panelists from clinical, academic, and research settings. Once consensus was achieved, the competencies were made available through the American Nurses Association for public comment. Public comments were then reviewed and integrated as needed.ResultsThe literature review resulted in a transition from genetics to genomics, given the reduction in costs, which resulted in an expansion of the scope of testing in both the germline and somatic contexts. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus prior to the public comment period. Public comments were solicited through the American Nurses Association, and each comment was reviewed by the authors and addressed as indicated.ConclusionThe Essentials of Genomic Nursing: Competencies and Outcome Indicators constitute the minimum competency in genomics required of all registered nurses regardless of the level of academic training, role, or specialty.Clinical RelevanceEvidence-based genomic applications span the entire healthcare continuum and, therefore, are relevant for all registered nurses regardless of academic training, role, practice setting, or clinical expertise. These competencies serve as the guide for the minimum requirements for registered nurse practice as well as guide curricula and continuing education for all registered nurses, including but not limited to administrators, educators, nursing leaders, practicing nurses, and researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 741
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome
    Samadder, N. Jewel
    Riegert-Johnson, Douglas
    Boardman, Lisa
    Rhodes, Deborah
    Wick, Myra
    Okuno, Scott
    Kunze, Katie L.
    Golafshar, Michael
    Uson, Pedro L. S., Jr.
    Mountjoy, Luke
    Ertz-Archambault, Natalie
    Patel, Neej
    Rodriguez, Eduardo A.
    Lizaola-Mayo, Blanca
    Lehrer, Michael
    Thorpe, Cameron S.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Esplin, Edward D.
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Azevedo, Cindy
    Klint, Margaret
    Hager, Megan
    Macklin-Mantia, Sarah
    Bryce, Alan H.
    Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S.
    Sekulic, Aleksandar
    Stewart, Keith A.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (02) : 230 - 237
  • [32] Referral, Uptake, and Outcome of Genetic Counseling and Testing in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Syed, Hareem
    Sommovilla, Joshua
    Burke, Carol A.
    McGee, Sarah
    Macaron, Carole
    Heald, Brandie
    Lyu, Ruishen
    Schmit, Stephanie L.
    Nair, Kanika
    Kamath, Suneel
    Krishnamurthi, Smitha
    Khorana, Alok A.
    Liska, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2023, 21 (11): : 1156 - +
  • [33] Current State of Genomics in Nursing: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Provider Oriented (Clinical and Educational) Outcomes (2012-2022)
    Thomas, Joanne
    Keels, Jordan
    Calzone, Kathleen A.
    Badzek, Laurie
    Dewell, Sarah
    Patch, Christine
    Tonkin, Emma T.
    Dwyer, Andrew A.
    [J]. GENES, 2023, 14 (11)
  • [34] Genetics and genomics in nursing: Evaluating Essentials implementation
    Thompson, Hilaire J.
    Brooks, Mirella Vasquez
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (06) : 623 - 627
  • [35] Core competencies in genetics for healthcare professionals: results from a literature review and a Delphi method
    Tognetto, Alessia
    Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Federici, Antonio
    Boccia, Stefania
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [36] Pharmacogenomics in clinical care
    Wysocki, Kenneth
    Seibert, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2019, 31 (08) : 443 - 446