Risk assessment of fire safety in large-scale commercial and high-rise buildings based on intuitionistic fuzzy and social graph

被引:6
作者
Wang, Yijie [1 ]
Zheng, Ruixiang [2 ]
Li, Mian [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Univ Michigan Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Joint Inst, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Global Inst Future Technol, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Automat, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Risk assessment; Social graph; Intuitionistic fuzzy; Fire safety; HIERARCHY PROCESS AHP; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109165
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fire risk assessment is a useful method to identify potential fire risks and improve safety management, especially for those large-scale commercial and high-rise buildings. However, after the establishment of the fire risk indexing system, the weight assignment in the existing assessment methods is not scientific and objective enough to synthesize the opinions of multiple experts with different knowledge backgrounds and working experience. To solve this problem, a novel fire risk assessment for large-scale commercial and high-rise buildings is proposed with intuitionistic fuzzy and social graph. First, based on the national standards of fire safety management, the monthly maintenance and the annual fire assessment reports, the indexing system is established. Then, a scientific and objective weight assignment method called Social Graph based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (SGIFAHP) is proposed such that (1) by utilizing the intuitionistic fuzzy and social graph, it can synthesize the positive, negative and hesitant opinions from multiple experts by considering the importance of experts; (2) a novel mechanism is designed to automatically check and repair the consistency of the opinions of each expert when the expert compares the importance of risk factors. To validate the performance of the proposed method, eleven buildings are selected and their fire safety data are collected. A comparison analysis is carried out with the existing methods to compare the assigned weights. The comparison and score validation conclude that the proposed method can assign more reasonable, scientific and objective weights than the existing methods while the scores are comprehensive and strongly interpretable. In the end, a guide is offered to help safety owners and inspectors improve fire safety with the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Al-Khasawneh A.L., 2023, J. Risk Financial Manag, V16, DOI [10.3390/jrfm16020086, DOI 10.3390/JRFM16020086]
[2]   Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects [J].
Aminbakhsh, Saman ;
Gunduz, Murat ;
Sonmez, Rifat .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2013, 46 :99-105
[3]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[4]   Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India [J].
Chakraborty, Subhankar ;
Mukhopadhyay, Sutapa .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 99 (01) :247-274
[5]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[6]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[7]   Evaluation of groundwater heavy metal pollution index through analytical hierarchy process and its health risk assessment via Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Chorol, Lobzang ;
Gupta, Sunil Kumar .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 170 :855-864
[8]  
De Smet E., 2008, Theoretical Basis and Technical Reference Guide: Fire Risk Assessment Method for Engineering
[9]  
[杜红兵 Du Hongbing], 2002, [中国矿业大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of China University of Mining & Technology], V31, P242
[10]  
Fontana M, 1984, SIA 81