Latent diffusion model-based MRI superresolution enhances mild cognitive impairment prognostication and Alzheimer's disease classification

被引:1
作者
Yoon, Dan [1 ]
Myong, Youho [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Young Gyun [1 ]
Sim, Yongsik [4 ]
Cho, Minwoo [5 ,6 ]
Oh, Byung-Mo [3 ]
Kim, Sungwan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch, Interdisciplinary Program Bioengn, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Transdisciplinary Med, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Mild cognitive impairment; Neurodegenerative disease; Generative AI; Brain MRI; Alzheimer's disease; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; NEUROIMAGING INITIATIVE ADNI; DIAGNOSIS; DEMENTIA; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120663
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Timely diagnosis and prognostication of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are pivotal for effective intervention. Artificial intelligence (AI) in neuroradiology may aid in such appropriate diagnosis and prognostication. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of novel diffusion modelbased AI for enhancing AD and MCI diagnosis through superresolution (SR) of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. Methods: 1.5T brain MR scans of patients with AD or MCI and healthy controls (NC) from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 (ADNI1) were superresolved to 3T using a novel diffusion model-based generative AI (d3T*) and a convolutional neural network-based model (c3T*). Comparisons of image quality to actual 1.5T and 3T MRI were conducted based on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), naturalness image quality evaluator (NIQE), and Blind/Referenceless Image Spatial Quality Evaluator (BRISQUE). Voxel-based volumetric analysis was then conducted to study whether 3T* images offered more accurate volumetry than 1.5T images. Binary and multiclass classifications of AD, MCI, and NC were conducted to evaluate whether 3T* images offered superior AD classification performance compared to actual 1.5T MRI. Moreover, CNN-based classifiers were used to predict conversion of MCI to AD, to evaluate the prognostication performance of 3T* images. The classification performances were evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and area under the receiver-operating curves (AUROC). Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) detected significant differences in image quality among the 1.5T, c3T*, d3T*, and 3T groups across all metrics. Both c3T* and d3T* showed superior image quality compared to 1.5T MRI in NIQE and BRISQUE with statistical significance. While the hippocampal volumes measured in 3T* and 3T images were not significantly different, the hippocampal volume measured in 1.5T images showed significant difference. 3T*-based AD classifications showed superior performance across all performance metrics compared to 1.5T-based AD classification. Classification performance between d3T* and actual 3T was not significantly different. 3T* images offered superior accuracy in predicting the conversion of MCI to AD than 1.5T images did. Conclusions: The diffusion model -based MRI SR enhances the resolution of brain MR images, significantly improving diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for AD and MCI. Superresolved 3T* images closely matched actual 3T MRIs in quality and volumetric accuracy, and notably improved the prediction performance of conversion from MCI to AD.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Perspectives and challenges in patient stratification in Alzheimer's disease
    Abdelnour, Carla
    Agosta, Federica
    Bozzali, Marco
    Fougere, Bertrand
    Iwata, Atsushi
    Nilforooshan, Ramin
    Takada, Leonel T.
    Vinuela, Felix
    Traber, Martin
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [2] Early-stage Alzheimer disease: getting trial-ready
    Aisen, Paul S.
    Jimenez-Maggiora, Gustavo A.
    Rafii, Michael S.
    Walter, Sarah
    Raman, Rema
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2022, 18 (07) : 389 - 399
  • [3] Chen YH, 2018, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P739
  • [4] Predictions of Alzheimer's disease treatment and care costs in European countries
    Cimler, Richard
    Maresova, Petra
    Kuhnova, Jitka
    Kuca, Kamil
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [5] Diffusion Models in Vision: A Survey
    Croitoru, Florinel-Alin
    Hondru, Vlad
    Ionescu, Radu Tudor
    Shah, Mubarak
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 45 (09) : 10850 - 10869
  • [6] Dhariwal P, 2021, ADV NEUR IN, V34
  • [7] Real-time line detection through an improved Hough transform voting scheme
    Fernandes, Leandro A. F.
    Oliveira, Manuel M.
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2008, 41 (01) : 299 - 314
  • [8] Evaluating Alzheimer's Disease Progression Using Rate of Regional Hippocampal Atrophy
    Franko, Edit
    Joly, Olivier
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [9] Neuroimaging in Dementia: More than Typical Alzheimer Disease
    Haller, Sven
    Jager, Hans Rolf
    Vernooij, Meike W.
    Barkhof, Frederik
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 308 (03)
  • [10] Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?
    Hara, Kensho
    Kataoka, Hirokatsu
    Satoh, Yutaka
    [J]. 2018 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2018, : 6546 - 6555