Dynamic stress response in reservoirs stimulated by fluctuating fluid pressure during pulsating hydraulic fracturing

被引:2
作者
Zhu, Ge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dong, Shimin [3 ]
Hanane, Bari [3 ]
Xin, Shun [4 ]
Wang, Hongbo [4 ]
Li, Weicheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Tianjin Key Lab Adv Mechatron Syst Design & Intell, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Technol, Natl Demonstrat Ctr Expt Mech & Elect Engn Educ, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[3] Yanshan Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Qinhuangdao 066004, Peoples R China
[4] Offshore Oil Engn Co LTD, Tianjin 300451, Peoples R China
来源
GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 240卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pulsating hydraulic fracturing; Elastodynamics; Poroelastodynamics; Dynamic stress; Staggered grid difference; Numerical simulation; WELLBORE-STABILITY; NUMERICAL INVERSION; DIFFERENCE METHOD; COAL SEAM; PROPAGATION; PERMEABILITY; DISTURBANCE; BOREHOLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Determining the most effective scheme for fracturing operations depends on accurate calculations of reservoir stress. Traditional fracturing theories usually focus on stable fluid injection modes, which employ static assumptions in modelling and analysis. However, pulsating hydraulic fracturing (PHF) introduces fluctuating fluid pressure to stimulate reservoirs, which requires considering dynamic factors and exploring the dynamic stress response within the reservoir. Furthermore, reservoirs are often classified as homogeneous continuous or porous media materials, but the boundaries between these classifications are sometimes apparent. This paper investigated the development of both an elastodynamics model and a poroelastodynamics model for calculating dynamic stress responses during PHF. The staggered grid finite difference method addressed these models, with the outer boundary employing the perfectly matched layer (PML) method to simulate an infinite reservoir. The numerical simulation results were extensively verified and compared with analytical solutions, and the differences between various models and their relevant conditions were thoroughly analyzed. Analyzing fluid pressure fluctuation parameters revealed noteworthy insights into reservoir stress response characteristics. Results indicate that as the Biot coefficient and permeability increase, the disparities between the elastodynamics and poroelastodynamics models become prominent. In practical terms, high Biot coefficient or high permeability reservoirs necessitate using the poroelastodynamics model for accurate reservoir stress analysis. As the frequency of fluid pressure fluctuation increases, the amplitude of response of reservoir circumferential stress also increases, while the response amplitude of radial stress and fluid pressure decreases. These findings offer valuable theoretical guidance for parameter design in engineering applications during PHF.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Stress cages and fracture cages in stress trajectory models of wellbores: Implications for pressure management during drilling and hydraulic fracturing [J].
Weijermars, Ruud .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 36 :986-1003
[32]   Proppant damage mechanisms in coal seam reservoirs during the hydraulic fracturing process: A review [J].
Ahamed, M. A. A. ;
Perera, M. S. A. ;
Li Dong-yin ;
Ranjith, P. G. ;
Matthai, S. K. .
FUEL, 2019, 253 :615-629
[33]   Modelling of hydraulic fracturing process by coupled discrete element and fluid dynamic methods [J].
Marina, Sousani ;
Imo-Imo, Eshiet Kenneth ;
Derek, Ingham ;
Mohamed, Pourkashanian ;
Yong, Sheng .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 72 (09) :3383-3399
[34]   Numerical study of dynamic fracture aperture during production of pressure-sensitive reservoirs [J].
Gu, Shaohua ;
Liu, Yuetian ;
Chen, Zhangxin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2014, 70 :229-239
[35]   An improved fluid flow algorithm for hydraulic fracturing: Optimizing domain volume and crack pressure update strategies [J].
Zhang, Wei ;
Bi, Jing ;
Zhao, Yu ;
Zhang, Yongfa ;
Wang, Chaolin ;
Pan, Yang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 35 (04) :639-657
[36]   An equivalent mathematical model for 2D stimulated reservoir volume simulation of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs [J].
Li, Zhiqiang ;
Qi, Zhilin ;
Yan, Wende ;
Xiao, Qianhua ;
Xiang, Zuping ;
Tao, Zhengwu .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2023, 45 (03) :8946-8964
[37]   Confining Stress Response to Hydraulic Fracturing Volumetric Opening on the Representative Volume Element (RVE) Scale [J].
Guo, Shuaifang ;
Cao, Yunxing ;
Wang, Li ;
Zhang, Xinsheng ;
Zhang, Wenying ;
Lin, Haixiao ;
Cao, Zhengzheng ;
Meng, Bingbing .
WATER, 2023, 15 (23)
[38]   Fracture and pore structure dynamic evolution of coals during hydraulic fracturing [J].
Lu, Yiyu ;
Wang, Li ;
Ge, Zhaolong ;
Zhou, Zhe ;
Deng, Kai ;
Zuo, Shaojie .
FUEL, 2020, 259
[39]   Simulation model of dynamic stress in reservoir under unsteady excitation of hydraulic fracturing [J].
Zhu G. ;
Dong S. ;
Pan Z. .
Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2021, 46 :149-156
[40]   Pore pressure and stress coupling in closely-spaced hydraulic fracturing designs on adjacent horizontal wellbores [J].
Sobhaniaragh, B. ;
Nguyen, V. P. ;
Mansur, W. J. ;
Peters, F. C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS A-SOLIDS, 2018, 67 :18-33