Seismic fragility and resilience assessment of steel frame with replaceable T-stub connection components

被引:1
作者
Li, Tong [1 ]
Men, Jinjie [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ]
Li, Jiafu [3 ]
Huang, Chao-Hsun [4 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Key Lab Struct Engn & Earthquake Resistance, Minist Educ, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[3] MCC Capital Engn & Res Inc Ltd, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
[4] Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
关键词
Steel frame with replaceable T-stub connection; components; Nonlinear dynamic analyses; Seismic fragility analysis; Non-structural damage; Seismic resilience evaluation; DAMAGE; BUILDINGS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118396
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Based on a rational design, steel beam-column joints with replaceable T-stub connection components (SBCJRTCCs) possess superior structural fuse performance and seismic resilience performance. To further evaluate the benefits of steel frames using RTCCs in terms of dynamic response, structural and non-structural components damage as well as seismic resilience, a 12-story steel frame equipped with RTCCs (SF-RTCCs) and a steel moment resisting frame (SMRF) were designed and established. On the basis of validating the simulation results with the experimental findings, the nonlinear dynamic analyses and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) based seismic fragility analysis was performed. The results confirm that the introducing RTCCs into steel frames can significantly mitigate base shear and floor acceleration as well as produce a more uniform inter-story deformation and a more rational yielding mechanism. Meanwhile, the SF-RTCCs can obtain comparable collapse-resistant performance compared to SMRF, and both frames possess sufficient redundancy to resist structural collapse. Thanks to the lower floor acceleration responses, the SF-RTCCSs performs much better than SMRF in controlling nonstructural components damage. After DBE excitations, the probabilities of RTCCs can be replaced by 1st class and 2nd class was 17.2 % and 84.9 %, respectively. After MCE excitations, RTCCs has about 29.3 % and 67.2 % probability that it can be replaced by 2nd class and 3rd class, respectively. Considering the lower economic losses, short repair time and fewer casualties, the rating of seismic resilience of SF-RTCCs was enhanced from one-star of SMRF to two-star.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ABAQUS, 2014, Analysis User's Manual, 6.14
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P58 FEMA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Code for Seismic Design of Buildings
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PRESTANDARD COMMENTA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BEIJ MUN CONSTR PROJ
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GB50017-2017
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GB/T 38591-2020
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, JGJ82-2011
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ANSI/AISC 341-10 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings