Prediction of myofascial pelvic pain syndrome based on random forest model

被引:1
作者
Yu, Hang [1 ]
Zhao, Hongguo [1 ]
Liu, Dongxia [1 ]
Dong, Yanhua [1 ]
Nai, Manman [1 ]
Song, Yikun [1 ]
Liu, Jiaxi [1 ]
Wang, Luwen [1 ]
Li, Lei [1 ]
Li, Xinbin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zhengzhou 450052, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
关键词
Myofascial pelvic pain syndrome; Random forest; Logistic regression; Modified Oxford muscle strength grading; Pelvic floor pressure assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31928
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective is to construct a random forest model for predicting the occurrence of Myofascial pelvic pain syndrome (MPPS) and compare its performance with a logistic regression model to demonstrate the superiority of the random forest model. Methods: We retrospectively analyze the clinical data of female patients who underwent pelvic floor screening due to chronic pelvic pain at the Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2021 to December 2023. A total of 543 female patients meeting the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria are randomly selected from this dataset and allocated to the MPPS group. Furthermore, 702 healthy female patients who underwent pelvic floor screening during routine physical examinations within the same timeframe are randomly selected and assigned to the non-MPPS group. Chi-square test and rank-sum test are used to select demographic variables, pelvic floor pressure assessment data variables, and modified Oxford muscle strength grading data for logistic univariate analysis. The selected variables are further subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a random forest model is also established. The predictive performance of the two models is evaluated by comparing their accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) area. Results: Based on a dataset of 1245 cases, we implement the random forest algorithm for the first time in the screening of MPPS. In this investigation, the Logistic regression model forecasts the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision of MPPS at 69.96 %, 57.46 %, 79.63 %, and 68.57 % respectively, with an AUC of the ROC curve at 0.755. Conversely, the random forest prediction model exhibits accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision rates of 87.11 %, 90.66 %, 90.91 %, and 83.51 % respectively, with an AUC of the ROC curve at 0.942. The random forest model showcases exceptional predictive performance during the initial screening of MPPS. Conclusion: The random forest model has exhibited exceptional predictive performance in the initial screening evaluation of MPPS disease. The development of this predictive framework holds significant importance in refining the precision of MPPS prediction within clinical environments and elevating treatment outcomes. This research carries profound global implications, given the potentially elevated misdiagnosis rates and delayed diagnosis proportions of MPPS on a worldwide scale, coupled with a potential scarcity of seasoned healthcare providers. Moving forward,
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ahangari A, 2014, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V17, pE141
  • [2] Akhmedzhanova L.T., 2022, Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics, V14, P54
  • [3] A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Al Mudawi, Naif
    Alazeb, Abdulwahab
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (11)
  • [4] Arora V., 2020, OBSTET GYNAECOLOGY R, V30, P269, DOI [10.1016/j.ogrm.2020.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.OGRM.2020.06.001]
  • [5] Machine learning algorithms as new screening approach for patients with endometriosis
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    Puchar, Anne
    Suisse, Stephane
    Delbos, Lea
    Poilblanc, Mathieu
    Descamps, Philippe
    Golfier, Francois
    Touboul, Cyril
    Dabi, Yohann
    Darai, Emile
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [6] Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of myofascial pain syndrome
    Cao, Qi-Wang
    Peng, Bao-Gan
    Wang, Lin
    Huang, You-Qing
    Jia, Dong-Lin
    Jiang, Hao
    Lv, Yan
    Liu, Xian-Guo
    Liu, Rong-Guo
    Li, Ying
    Song, Tao
    Shen, Wen
    Yu, Ling-Zhi
    Zheng, Yong-Jun
    Liu, Yan-Qing
    Huang, Dong
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (09) : 2077 - +
  • [7] The 2013 EAU Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain: Is Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain a Habit, a Philosophy, or a Science? 10 Years of Development
    Engeler, Daniel S.
    Baranowski, Andrew P.
    Dinis-Oliveira, Paulo
    Elneil, Suzy
    Hughes, John
    Messelink, Embert J.
    van Ophoven, Arndt
    Williams, Amanda C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (03) : 431 - 439
  • [8] How Does Myofascial Physical Therapy Attenuate Pain in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome?
    Grinberg, Keren
    Weissman-Fogel, Irit
    Lowenstein, Lior
    Abramov, Liora
    Granot, Michal
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 2019
  • [9] Myofascial pain syndrome in the pelvic floor: A common urological condition
    Itza, F.
    Zarza, D.
    Serra, L.
    Gomez-Sancha, F.
    Salinas, J.
    Allona-Almagro, A.
    [J]. ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2010, 34 (04): : 318 - 326
  • [10] COVID-19 Patient Health Prediction Using Boosted Random Forest Algorithm
    Iwendi, Celestine
    Bashir, Ali Kashif
    Peshkar, Atharva
    Sujatha, R.
    Chatterjee, Jyotir Moy
    Pasupuleti, Swetha
    Mishra, Rishita
    Pillai, Sofia
    Jo, Ohyun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8