Is ChatGPT a Reliable Source of Transportation Equity Information for Scientific Writing?

被引:0
|
作者
Kutela, Boniphace [1 ]
Li, Shoujia [2 ]
Das, Subasish [3 ]
Liu, Jinli [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Transportat Inst, Roadway Safety Program, Houston, TX 77024 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[3] Texas State Univ, San Marcos, TX USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2024: TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, ICTD 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Transportation equity; Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Transportation equity is an interdisciplinary agenda that requires both transportation and social inputs. Traditionally, transportation equity information is sourced from public libraries, conferences, television, and social media, among others. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including advanced language models such as ChatGPT, are becoming favorite information sources. However, their credibility has not been well explored. This study explored the content and usefulness of ChatGPT-generated information related to transportation equity. It utilized 152 papers retrieved through the Web of Science (WoS) repository. The prompt was crafted for ChatGPT to provide an abstract given the paper's title. The ChatGPT's abstracts were then compared to human-written abstracts using statistical tools and unsupervised text mining. The results indicate a weak similarity between ChatGPT and human-written abstracts. On average, the human-written and ChatGPT-generated abstracts were about 58% similar, with a maximum and minimum of 97% and 1.4%, respectively. The keywords from the abstracts of papers with over the mean similarity score were more likely to be similar, whereas those below the average score were less likely to be similar. Themes with high similarity scores include access, public transit, and policy, among others. Contrarily, the findings from collocated keywords were inconclusive. The study findings suggest that ChatGPT has the potential to be a source of transportation equity information. However, currently, a great amount of attention is needed before a user can utilize materials from ChatGPT.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 537
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is ChatGPT a reliable source of scientific information regarding third-molar surgery?
    de Sousa, Rafael Aguiar
    Costa, Samuel Macedo
    Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Almeida
    Camargos, Caroline Rabelo
    Ribeiro, Bruna Campos
    Alves e Silva, Micena Roberta Miranda
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 155 (03): : 227 - 232.e6
  • [2] Is ChatGPT a Reliable Source of Patient Information on Asthma?
    Alabdulmohsen, Dalal M.
    Almahmudi, Mesa A.
    Alhashim, Jehad N.
    Almahdi, Mohammed H.
    Alkishy, Eman F.
    Almossabeh, Modhahir J.
    Alkhalifah, Saleh A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [3] ChatGPT and scientific writing
    Mungmunpuntipantip, Rujittika
    Kleebayoon, Amnuay
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2023, 53 (03) : 267 - 267
  • [4] Is ChatGPT an Accurate and Reliable Source of Information for Patients with Vaccine and Statin Hesitancy?
    Torun, Cundullah
    Sarmis, Abdurrahman
    Oguz, Aytekin
    MEDENIYET MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 39 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [5] ChatGPT in Scientific Writing: A Cautionary Tale
    Zheng, Haoyi
    Zhan, Huichun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 136 (08): : 725 - +
  • [7] Correspondence on "Is ChatGPT an Accurate and Reliable Source of Information for Patients with Vaccine and Statin Hesitancy?"
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    MEDENIYET MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 39 (02): : 144 - 145
  • [8] Beware of references when using ChatGPT as a source of information to write scientific articles
    Sanchez-Ramos, Luis
    Lin, Lifeng
    Romero, Roberto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (03) : 356 - 357
  • [9] ChatGPT for scientific writing - The coexistence of opportunities and challenges
    Zhou, Liangbin
    Wu, Alex Chao
    Hegyi, Peter
    Wen, Chunyi
    Qin, Ling
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2024, 44 : A1 - A3
  • [10] Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
    Alkaissi, Hussam
    McFarlane, Samy I.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)