Two techniques to reduce the Pareto optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization problems

被引:0
作者
Ahmadi, Fatemeh [1 ]
Foroutannia, Davoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Vali E Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Dept Math, Rafsanjan, Iran
关键词
pareto; nondominated; A P-efficiency; multi-objective programming; CRITERIA; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.22049/cco.2024.28753.1700
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this study, for a decomposed multi-objective optimization problem, we propose the direct sum of the preference matrices of the subproblems provided by the decision maker (DM). Then, using this matrix, we present a new generalization of the rational efficiency concept for solving the multi-objective optimization problem (MOP). A problem that sometimes occurs in multi-objective optimization is the existence of a large set of Pareto optimal solutions. Hence, decision making based on selecting a unique preferred solution becomes difficult. Considering models with the concept of generalized rational efficiency can relieve some of the burden from the DM by shrinking the solution set. This paper discusses both theoretical and practical aspects of rationally efficient solutions related to this concept. Moreover, we present two techniques to reduce the Pareto optimal solutions using. The first technique involves using the powers of the preference matrix, while the second technique involves creating a new preference matrix by modifying the decomposition of the MOP.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Multi-objective Pareto-optimal control: an application to wastewater management [J].
L. J. Alvarez-Vázquez ;
N. García-Chan ;
A. Martínez ;
M. E. Vázquez-Méndez .
Computational Optimization and Applications, 2010, 46 :135-157
[12]   Multi-objective Pareto-optimal control: an application to wastewater management [J].
Alvarez-Vazquez, L. J. ;
Garcia-Chan, N. ;
Martinez, A. ;
Vazquez-Mendez, M. E. .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 46 (01) :135-157
[13]   A cognitive approach for the multi-objective optimization of RC structural problems [J].
Yepes, V. ;
Garcia-Segura, T. ;
Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. .
ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 15 (04) :1024-1036
[14]   ADAPTIVE MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION BASED ON NONDOMINATED SOLUTIONS [J].
Yang, Dongdong ;
Jiao, Licheng ;
Gong, Maoguo .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2009, 25 (02) :84-108
[15]   EXISTENCE, PROPER PARETO REDUCIBILITY, AND CONNECTEDNESS OF THE NONDOMINATED SET IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION [J].
Pourkarimi, Latif ;
Soleimani-Damaneh, Majid .
JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR AND CONVEX ANALYSIS, 2018, 19 (07) :1287-1295
[16]   Automatic calibration of hydrologic models with multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and Pareto optimization [J].
Confesor, Remegio B., Jr. ;
Whittaker, Gerald W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2007, 43 (04) :981-989
[17]   Pareto layer: Its formulation and search by way of evolutionary multi-objective optimization [J].
Avigad, Gideon ;
Eisenstadt, Erella ;
Goldvard, Alexander .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 42 (05) :453-470
[18]   A novel multi-objective optimization algorithm based on artificial algae for multi-objective engineering design problems [J].
Tawhid, Mohamed A. ;
Savsani, Vimal .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (10) :3762-3781
[19]   Evolutionary Multi-modal Optimization with the Use of Multi-objective Techniques [J].
Siwik, Leszek ;
Drezewski, Rafal .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING ICAISC 2014, PT I, 2014, 8467 :428-439
[20]   Strength Pareto Particle Swarm Optimization and Hybrid EA-PSO for Multi-Objective Optimization [J].
Elhossini, Ahmed ;
Areibi, Shawki ;
Dony, Robert .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 18 (01) :127-156