Initial clinical outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Is it safe and effective?

被引:1
|
作者
Lippert, Trenton [1 ]
Ross, Sharona [2 ]
Pattilachan, Tara [2 ]
Christodoulou, Maria [2 ]
Gratsianskiy, Denis [2 ]
Rosemurgy, Alexander [2 ]
Sucandy, Iswanto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Florida Morsani, Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
[2] AdventHealth, Digest Hlth Inst, 3000 Medical Park Dr,Suite 500, Tampa, FL 33613 USA
关键词
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection; Klatskin tumor; minimally invasive liver surgery; perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; robotic bile duct cancer surgery; RECTAL-CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; SURVIVAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27676
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectivesWe aimed to describe our outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the largest single institutional series in the Western hemisphere to date.MethodsBetween 2016 and 2022, we prospectively followed all patients who underwent robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.ResultsIn total, 23 patients underwent robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 18 receiving concomitant hepatectomy. The median age was 73 years. Operative time was 470 min with an estimated blood loss of 150 mL. No intraoperative conversions to open or other intraoperative complications occurred. Median length of stay was 5 days. Four postoperative complications occurred. Three readmissions occurred within 30 days with one 90-day mortality. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients and R1 in 13% of patients. At a median follow-up of 27 months, 15 patients were alive without evidence of disease, two patients with local recurrence at 1 year, and six were deceased.ConclusionsUtilization of the robotic platform for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible with excellent perioperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term oncological outcomes. Robotic resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe and effective when performed by experienced minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgeons in a population of carefully chosen patients. This institution series of robotically assisted resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from a high-volume minimally invasive hepatobiliary program demonstrates excellent perioperative outcomes while achieving a shorter length of stay than what has been previously reported in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 108
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
    Minas Baltatzis
    Santhalingam Jegatheeswaran
    Ajith K.Siriwardena
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2020, 19 (02) : 103 - 108
  • [32] Actual 10-Year Survival after Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: What Factors Preclude a Chance for Cure?
    van Keulen, Anne-Marleen
    Olthof, Pim B.
    Cescon, Matteo
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Nadalin, Silvio
    Pratschke, Johann
    Ratti, Francesca
    Troisi, Roberto I.
    Groot Koerkamp, Bas
    Buettner, Stefan
    Erdmann, Joris I.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [33] Results of adjuvant radiation therapy for locoregional perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative intent resection
    Leng, Kai-Ming
    Liu, Yue-Ping
    Wang, Zhi-Dong
    Zhong, Xiang-Yu
    Liao, Guan-Qun
    Kang, Peng-Cheng
    Cui, Yun-Fu
    Jiang, Xing-Ming
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 2257 - 2266
  • [34] The value of lymphadenectomy in surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Lei
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Ming-Da
    Xing, Hao
    Diao, Yong-Kang
    Jia, Hang-Dong
    Lau, Wan Yee
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Zhang, Cheng-Wu
    Shen, Feng
    Huang, Dong-Sheng
    Yang, Tian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 (09) : 1575 - 1586
  • [35] Impact of Combined Vascular Resection and Reconstruction in Patients with Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Kuriyama, Naohisa
    Komatsubara, Haruna
    Nakagawa, Yuki
    Maeda, Koki
    Shinkai, Toru
    Noguchi, Daisuke
    Ito, Takahiro
    Gyoten, Kazuyuki
    Hayasaki, Aoi
    Fujii, Takehiro
    Iizawa, Yusuke
    Murata, Yasuhiro
    Tanemura, Akihiro
    Kishiwada, Masashi
    Sakurai, Hiroyuki
    Mizuno, Shugo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (12) : 3108 - 3118
  • [36] Liver Resection for Type IV Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Left or Right Trisectionectomy?
    Jeddou, Heithem
    Tzedakis, Stylianos
    Orlando, Francesco
    Robert, Antoine
    Meneyrol, Eric
    Bergeat, Damien
    Robin, Fabien
    Sulpice, Laurent
    Boudjema, Karim
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [37] Concomitant Hepatic Artery Resection for Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Narrative Review
    Noji, Takehiro
    Hirano, Satoshi
    Tanaka, Kimitaka
    Matsui, Aya
    Nakanishi, Yoshitsugu
    Asano, Toshimichi
    Nakamura, Toru
    Tsuchikawa, Takahiro
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [38] Prognostic value of resection margin and lymph node status in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Koca, Faruk
    Petrova, Ekaterina
    El Youzouri, Hanan
    Heil, Jan
    Heise, Michael
    Sliwinski, Svenja
    Bechstein, Wolf O.
    Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
    HPB, 2025, 27 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [39] Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Dondossola, Daniele
    Ghidini, Michele
    Grossi, Francesco
    Rossi, Giorgio
    Foschi, Diego
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (25) : 3542 - 3561
  • [40] Lost in translation: confusion on resection and dissection planes hampers the interpretation of pathology reports for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Roos, Eva
    Franken, Lotte C.
    Soer, Eline C.
    van Hooft, Jeanin E.
    Takkenberg, R. Bart
    Klumpen, Heinz-Josef
    Wilmink, Johanna W.
    van de Vijver, Marc J.
    van Gulik, Thomas M.
    Verheij, Joanne
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2019, 475 (04) : 435 - 443