Robotics and Navigation Do Not Affect the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis

被引:4
作者
Lavalva, Scott M. [1 ,2 ]
Chiu, Yu-Fen [1 ,3 ]
Fowler, Mia J. [1 ,2 ]
Lyman, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Carli, Alberto V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Biostat Core, Res Adm, New York, NY USA
关键词
ACETABULAR COMPONENT; DISLOCATION; REVISION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.23.00289
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of computer navigation or robotic assistance during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has yielded numerous benefits due to more accurate component positioning. The utilization of these tools is generally associated with longer operative times and also necessitates additional surgical equipment and personnel in the operating room. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology assistance on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary THA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records for 12,726 patients who had undergone primary THA at a single high-volume institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients were stratified by surgical technique (conventional THA, computer-navigated THA [CN-THA], or robotic-assisted THA [RA-THA]) and were matched 1:1 with use of propensity score matching. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the rates of PJI within 90 days postoperatively between the cohorts. Results: After propensity score matching, there were 4,006 patients in the THA versus RA-THA analysis (2,003 in each group) and 5,288 patients in the THA versus CN-THA analysis (2,644 in each group). CN-THA (p < 0.001) and RA-THA (p < 0.001) were associated with longer operative times compared with conventional THA by 3 and 11 minutes, respectively. The rates of PJI after conventional THA (0.2% to 0.4%) were similar to those after CN-THA (0.4%) and RA-THA (0.4%). On the basis of logistic regression, the development of PJI was not associated with the use of computer navigation (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7 to 5.3]; p = 0.232) or robotic assistance (OR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.3]; p = 0.808). Conclusions: Despite longer operative times associated with the use of computer navigation and robotic assistance, the use of these tools was not associated with an increased risk of PJI within 90 days after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 589
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry [J].
Agarwal, Sujit ;
Eckhard, Lukas ;
Walter, William L. ;
Peng, Andrea ;
Hatton, Alesha ;
Donnelly, Bill ;
de Steiger, Richard .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (20) :1900-1905
[2]   Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty A meta-analysis [J].
Beckmann, Johannes ;
Stengel, Dirk ;
Tingart, Markus ;
Goetz, Juergen ;
Grifka, Joachim ;
Luering, Christian .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2009, 80 (05) :538-544
[3]   Robotic Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation When Compared to Manual Techniques [J].
Bendich, Ilya ;
Vigdorchik, Jonathan M. ;
Sharma, Abhi K. ;
Mayman, David J. ;
Sculco, Peter K. ;
Anderson, Chris ;
Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez ;
Su, Edwin P. ;
Jerabek, Seth A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06) :1124-1129
[4]   Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Bohl, Daniel D. ;
Nolte, Michael T. ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Calkins, Tyler E. ;
Della Valle, Craig J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (03) :250-256
[5]   Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Utilization Trends [J].
Boylan, Matthew ;
Suchman, Kelly ;
Vigdorchik, Jonathan ;
Slover, James ;
Bosco, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (04) :1019-1023
[6]   Robotic-assisted compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Xiong, Jianping ;
Wang, Peipei ;
Zhu, Shibai ;
Qi, Wenting ;
Peng, Huiming ;
Yu, Lingjia ;
Qian, Wenwei .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 94 (1112) :335-341
[7]   Is there increased value in robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty? A NATIONWIDE OUTCOMES, TRENDS, AND PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS OF 4,699,894 CASES [J].
Emara, A. K. ;
Zhou, G. ;
Klika, A. K. ;
Koroukian, S. M. ;
Schiltz, N. K. ;
Higuera-Rueda, C. A. ;
Molloy, R. M. ;
Piuzzi, N. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (09) :1488-1496
[8]  
Hsiue Peter P, 2020, Arthroplast Today, V6, P112, DOI [10.1016/j.artd.2019.12.009, 10.1016/j.artd.2019.12.009]
[9]   Postsurgical infection from using a computed tomography-based hip navigation system during total hip arthroplasty [J].
Inoue, Daisuke ;
Kabata, Tamon ;
Kajino, Yoshitomo ;
Ohmori, Takaaki ;
Ueno, Takuro ;
Taga, Tadashi ;
Takagi, Tomoharu ;
Yoshitani, Junya ;
Ueoka, Ken ;
Yamamuro, Yuuki ;
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) :1097-1101
[10]   Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty -: Is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? [J].
Kalteis, T ;
Handel, A ;
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02) :163-167