Preferences for Remote and Hybrid Work: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:5
作者
Waldrep, Carolyn E. [1 ]
Fritz, Marni [2 ]
Glass, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Sociol, Austin, TX 78723 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Sociol, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
来源
SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
remote work; work from home; job satisfaction; desire to work remotely; productivity; flexibility; commute; childcare; household organization; pandemic; HOME;
D O I
10.3390/socsci13060303
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic created an opportunity for many American workers to work from home. Did the rapid and widespread adoption of remote work arrangements influence workers' preferences? This study analyzes the early pandemic work experiences of 52 participants (20 men and 32 women) in dual-earner households with children through in-depth interviews conducted in 2021 and 2022 via Zoom. The study explores respondents' desire for remote and hybrid work, considering job satisfaction as well as job characteristics, family structure, and household organization. Unless their jobs were poorly suited to remote work, most workers with pandemic-era remote work opportunities-and even some who had not worked remotely-wished to keep remote access in their post-pandemic work arrangements. Respondents reported enhanced job satisfaction and productivity from remote work, as a result of greater schedule control and flexibility. We found that some workers were willing to change jobs to maintain their preferred work arrangement, while others acquiesced to employers' return-to-work policies. The study highlights the need to understand workers' preferences in supporting flexible work arrangements and contributes to the understanding of remote work on family dynamics during the pandemic and afterwards.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Adam Ozimek, SSRN Scholarly Paper #3638597 2020
  • [2] How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings
    Allen, Tammy D.
    Golden, Timothy D.
    Shockley, Kristen M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2015, 16 (02) : 40 - 68
  • [3] Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on office worker productivity and work experience
    Awada, Mohamad
    Lucas, Gale
    Becerik-Gerber, Burcin
    Roll, Shawn
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2021, 69 (04): : 1171 - 1189
  • [4] Barrero J. M., 2021, WHY WORKING HOME WIL, DOI DOI 10.3386/W28731
  • [5] Bernstein E, Harvard Business Review Internet
  • [6] Bloom N., 2023, Harvard Business ReviewJanuary 5
  • [7] Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Liang, James
    Roberts, John
    Ying, Zhichun Jenny
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2015, 130 (01) : 165 - 218
  • [8] Bremen J.M., 2023, Forbes
  • [9] Brynjolfsson E., 2020, COVID 19 REMOTE WORK, P25, DOI [DOI 10.3386/W27344, 10.3386/w27344]
  • [10] By Default: How Mothers in Different-Sex Dual-Earner Couples Account for Inequalities in Pandemic Parenting
    Calarco, Jessica McCrory
    Meanwell, Emily
    Anderson, Elizabeth M.
    Knopf, Amelia S.
    [J]. SOCIUS, 2021, 7