Asymmetric network monitoring and punishment in public goods experiments

被引:18
作者
Boosey, Luke [1 ]
Isaac, R. Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Econ, 288 Bellamy Bldg, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Networks; Public goods; Monitoring; Punishment; Asymmetry; Retaliation; SOCIAL DILEMMA; COOPERATION; SANCTIONS; GAMES; ENFORCEMENT; PROVISION; MECHANISM; MONETARY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2016.09.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We extend the recent experimental literature on incomplete punishment networks in linear public goods games. In these games, we use an exogenous network to restrict both monitoring and the set of feasible punishment flows. In addition to two baseline structures (the Complete network and the Circle network), we examine a novel Asymmetric network in which both punishment responsibility and exposure differ across players. Average contributions are significantly lower in the Asymmetric network, driven entirely by the under-monitored player who faces only one potential punisher. We formulate and examine the hypothesis that asymmetry among a player's potential punishment targets may lead to discriminatory patterns of punishment. In particular, players might wish to punish targets for whom they are solely responsible discriminately more than targets for whom they share responsibility. The experimental data do not support this hypothesis, although they do suggest a compelling explanation as to why. Specifically, we find that the under monitored player in the network retaliates against previous punishment significantly more often than others in the group, which deters their only potential punisher from issuing stronger sanctions. Thus, an additional complication of asymmetry in the network is that it may lead to more instances of anti-social retaliation, inhibiting the effectiveness of the decentralized punishment institution. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 41
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand? The demand for punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism [J].
Anderson, CM ;
Putterman, L .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2006, 54 (01) :1-24
[2]   Informal insurance in social networks [J].
Bloch, Francis ;
Genicot, Garance ;
Ray, Debraj .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2008, 143 (01) :36-58
[3]   Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments [J].
Bochet, O ;
Page, T ;
Putterman, L .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 60 (01) :11-26
[4]   Risk-sharing networks [J].
Bramoulle, Yann ;
Kranton, Rachel .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 64 (3-4) :275-294
[5]   Public goods in networks [J].
Bramoulle, Yann ;
Kranton, Rachel .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 135 (01) :478-494
[6]   Network architecture, cooperation and punishment in public good experiments [J].
Carpenter, Jeffrey ;
Kariv, Shachar ;
Schotter, Andrew .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DESIGN, 2012, 16 (2-3) :93-118
[7]   What norms trigger punishment? [J].
Carpenter, Jeffrey ;
Matthews, Peter Hans .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (03) :272-288
[8]   Punishing free-riders: How group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods [J].
Carpenter, Jeffrey P. .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2007, 60 (01) :31-51
[9]   The demand for punishment [J].
Carpenter, Jeffrey P. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 62 (04) :522-542