Developing an indicator framework for sustainability assessment in urban community regeneration: A case of Shanghai

被引:7
作者
Li, Wenzhu [1 ]
Meng, Meng [2 ]
Llewellyn, Clark E. [3 ]
Sun, Tongyu [4 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Art Design & Media, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Fac Architecture, Guangzhou 510641, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Sch Architecture, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sustainability assessment; Urban community regeneration; Indicator framework; Bayesian best -worst method; Weight allocation; ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS; DECISION-MAKING; CITY; RENEWAL; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT; CITIES; AREAS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100476
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Sustainability assessment is essential in urban community regeneration process. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research on quantifying sustainable urban regeneration at the community scale, while the selecting and weighting of relevant indicators are subjective and one-sided. Meanwhile, given the inadequacy of international sustainability assessment tools in addressing local urban challenges, this study aims to develop a communityscale indicator framework for sustainability assessment in urban regeneration in Shanghai, China. The study initially establishes a four-level hierarchical structure and an alternative indicator database. Appropriate indicators are then selected using the Delphi method, while weights are derived via the Bayesian best-worst method. The proposed indicator framework comprises 38 indicators from 7 elements with weights across various levels. Notably, resource utilization, ecological environment, and green building elements exhibit higher weights, indicating their priority in urban community regeneration. This framework covers environmental, social, and economic aspects, employing a comparatively objective selection of indicators, along with localized weights that incorporate local knowledge. It can aid in identifying communities requiring urgent regeneration and pinpointing significant issues, thereby guiding the regeneration process and suggesting appropriate response strategies for urban planners and designers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[11]   Using carrying capacity as a baseline for building sustainability assessment [J].
Bendewald, Michael ;
Zhai, Zhiqiang .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 37 :22-32
[12]   Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems [J].
Berardi U. .
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2013, 15 (6) :1573-1591
[13]  
Boomsma A., 1982, SYSTEMS INDIRECT OBS, P149
[14]   Building energy models and assessment systems at the district and city scales: a review [J].
Bourdic, Loeiz ;
Salat, Serge .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2012, 40 (04) :518-526
[15]  
BRE, 2013, BREEAM Communities: Technical Manual SD202-0.1: 2012
[16]  
Chao An., 2013, Landscape architecture, P22
[17]   Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings [J].
Conte, Emilia ;
Monno, Valeria .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 34 :31-40
[18]   Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency [J].
Couch, Chris ;
Sykes, Olivier ;
Boerstinghaus, Wolfgang .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2011, 75 :1-52
[19]   AN EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATION OF THE DELPHI METHOD TO THE USE OF EXPERTS [J].
DALKEY, N ;
HELMER, O .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1963, 9 (03) :458-467
[20]   Comparative study of city-level sustainability assessment standards in China and the United States [J].
Dang, Xianxian ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Feng, Wei ;
Zhou, Nan ;
Wang, Youwei ;
Meng, Chong ;
Ginsberg, Mark .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 251