Training of Future Specialists in Law in Higher Education Institutions of the PRC for the Protection of Intellectual Property as a Problem of Pedagogical Theory and Practice

Intellectual property rights are a catalyst for the process of creation, development, and dissemination of innovations. In recent years, the role of the innovation economy has become increasingly important in China. Against this background, the role of education in the field of intellectual property protection is increasing. This study is aimed at analyzing the accumulated research results and information from official sources to identify challenges for the educational system of the PRC regarding the training of specialized legal specialists in the field of intellectual property and copyright. The results of the study give reason to say that currently the training of specialists in this profile, except specialized universities, is carried out rather limitedly. Preference is given to courses at the secondary educational level and training of specialists in non-legal specialties. Besides that, currently, there is no special arrangement about intellectual property rights in the curriculum of university students. Based on the obtained results and conducted analysis, the authors formulate certain recommendations regarding the directions for further improvement of education in the field of intellectual property in China. Specifically, there is a need to address inconsistencies in existing curricula and certification programs, as well as to develop a currently lacking clear regulatory framework that would assist higher education institutions in the development of educational programs. Considering the scarcity of qualified specialists in the field of intellectual property (IP), enhancing the teaching standards would be unattainable without the implementation of a comprehensive training program aimed at bridging the existing gap. Furthermore, a paradigm shift in teaching methodologies is warranted, ensuring the continual update of materials in alignment with industry changes, exposing both educators and students to international best practices, and actively involving business representatives and practicing professionals in the educational process. This involvement would entail structuring the practical component of the curriculum around real-life legal case studies, thereby fostering a more immersive learning experience. It seems reasonable to assert that, taking into account the set political goals for the development of the field of intellectual property, Chinese education will have to expand the scope of teaching in the IP specialty beyond the limits of exclusive jurisprudence. The obtained results will also prove beneficial to researchers from other nations where education in the field of intellectual property (IP) is undergoing developmental stages. An analysis of the issues, their causes, and approaches to their resolution in China will facilitate a better understanding of potential problem origins in other countries, thus inspiring valuable insights for the advancement of the field.