Assessing quality of life in pulmonary arterial hypertension: An independent prognostic marker

被引:2
作者
Reeves, Glenn Edward Malcolm [1 ,2 ]
Shepherd, Julie [3 ]
Collins, Nicholas John [1 ]
Twaddell, Scott [1 ]
Harjit Singh, Rajinder [1 ]
机构
[1] NSW Hlth HNELHD, John Hunter Hosp, Hunter Reg Mail Ctr, Locked Bag 1, Warabrook, NSW 2310, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] John Hunter Hosp, Immune & Clin Trials Unit, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
functional ability/impairment/quality of life/physical activity; health outcomes assessment/cost effectiveness; mortality; prognosis; pulmonary arterial hypertension; LANDSCAPE; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.1002/pul2.12380
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, or PH Group 1), a disease of aberrant pulmonary vascular remodeling, causing progressive right heart failure (RHF) due to elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Patient mortality risk stratification guides choice and intensity of pharmacological intervention and is assessed by haemodynamics (especially PVR) as well as noninvasive tools including WHO functional class (FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and NT-proBNP levels. Quality of life (QOL) assessment is acknowledged as a central aspect of patient-centered care, but our study sought to extend QOL's role as an additional noninvasive risk marker that could further refine risk stratification and hence therapeutic choices within a "treatment to target" paradigm (aiming to achieve low-risk status). This study found that QOL assessment using the PAH-SYMPACT (c) physical activity tool provided enhanced, independent mortality risk information, with one unit rise in this score associated with a 41% increase in likelihood risk (odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.98 (p < 0.05)) of falling within intermediate versus low-group category. We therefore found further support for additional prognostic value being conferred by measurement of QOL as part of routine PAH evaluation, reinforcing its critical role.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P1448
[2]   Development and Validation of an Abridged Version of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score Calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for Use in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [J].
Benza, Raymond L. ;
Kanwar, Manreet K. ;
Raina, Amresh ;
Scott, Jacqueline V. ;
Zhao, Carol L. ;
Selej, Mona ;
Elliott, C. Greg ;
Farber, Harrison W. .
CHEST, 2021, 159 (01) :337-346
[3]   Risk assessment, prognosis and guideline implementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension [J].
Boucly, Athenais ;
Weatherald, Jason ;
Savale, Laurent ;
Jais, Xavier ;
Cottin, Vincent ;
Prevot, Gregoire ;
Picard, Francois ;
de Groote, Pascal ;
Jevnikar, Mitja ;
Bergot, Emmanuel ;
Chaouat, Ari ;
Chabanne, Celine ;
Bourdin, Arnaud ;
Parent, Florence ;
Montani, David ;
Simonneau, Gerald ;
Humbert, Marc ;
Sitbon, Olivier .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50 (02)
[4]  
Brent Robert J, 2023, Int J Environ Res Public Health, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20054637
[5]   Pulmonary hypertension in Europe: a call to action [J].
Burki, Talha .
LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (05) :E65-E65
[6]   Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression [J].
Bursac, Zoran ;
Gauss, C. Heath ;
Williams, David Keith ;
Hosmer, David W. .
SOURCE CODE FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01)
[7]   Measurement of quality of life in pulmonary hypertension and its significance [J].
Cenedese, E. ;
Speich, R. ;
Dorschner, L. ;
Ulrich, S. ;
Maggiorini, M. ;
Jenni, R. ;
Fischler, M. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 28 (04) :808-815
[8]   Comparison of cardiac and pulmonary-specific quality-of-life measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension [J].
Chen, H. ;
De Marco, T. ;
Kobashigawa, E. A. ;
Katz, P. P. ;
Chang, V. W. ;
Blanc, P. D. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 38 (03) :608-616
[9]   Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England [J].
Devlin, Nancy J. ;
Shah, Koonal K. ;
Feng, Yan ;
Mulhern, Brendan ;
van Hout, Ben .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 27 (01) :7-22
[10]  
DRUMMOND MF, 2005, METHODS EC EVALUATIO