Views of patients with progressive illness and carers about the role of digital advance care planning systems to record and share information: A qualitative study

被引:1
|
作者
Birtwistle, Jacqueline [1 ]
Allsop, Matthew J. [1 ]
Bradshaw, Andy [2 ]
Martin, Pablo Millares [3 ]
Sleeman, Katherine E. [2 ]
Twiddy, Maureen [4 ]
Evans, Catherine J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Acad Unit Palliat Care, Worsley Bldg,Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9LU, England
[2] Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, London, England
[3] Whitehall Surg, Leeds, England
[4] Univ Hull, Inst Clin & Appl Hlth Res, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
Patients; caregivers; digital technology; advance care planning; qualitative research; palliative care;
D O I
10.1177/02692163241255511
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital approaches are being explored internationally to support the elicitation, documentation and sharing of advance care planning information. However, the views and experiences of patients and carers are little understood, impeding the development and impact of digital approaches to strengthen palliative and end-of-life care.Aim: To explore perspectives of patients with progressive illness and their carers on digital approaches to advance care planning, anticipated impact from their use and expectations for their future development.Design: A qualitative study employing thematic framework analysis of data collected from focus groups and semi-structured interviews.Setting/participants: Purposive sample of 29 patients and 15 current or bereaved carers in London and West Yorkshire from hospice settings, non-governmental support and advocacy groups, and care home residents.Results: Four generated themes included: 1. 'Why haven't you read what's wrong with me?'; uncertainty around professionals' documenting, sharing and use of information; 2. The art of decision-making relies on the art of conversation; 3. The perceived value in having 'a say in matters': control and responsibility; 4. Enabling patient and carer control of their records: 'custodianship is key'.Conclusions: Lived experiences of information sharing influenced trust and confidence in digital advance care planning systems. Despite scepticism about the extent that care can be delivered in line with their preferences, patients and carers acknowledge digital systems could facilitate care through contemporaneous and accurately documented wishes and preferences. There remains a need to determine how independent patient and public-facing advance care planning resources might be integrated with existing digital health record systems.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 724
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] When do Physicians and Nurses Start Communication about Advance Care Planning? A Qualitative Study at an Acute Care Hospital in Japan
    Mari Tsuruwaka
    Yoshiko Ikeguchi
    Megumi Nakamura
    Asian Bioethics Review, 2020, 12 : 289 - 305
  • [42] Relationships Between Advanced Cancer Patients' Worry About Dying and Illness Understanding, Treatment Preferences, and Advance Care Planning
    Rodenbach, Rachel A.
    Althouse, Andrew D.
    Schenker, Yael
    Smith, Thomas J.
    Chu, Edward
    White, Douglas B.
    Bakitas, Marie
    Arnold, Robert M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (04) : 723 - +
  • [43] Service Provider Perspectives on Advance Care Planning Use in Rural Dementia Patients and Caregivers: A Qualitative Study
    Zhang, Peiyuan
    Nketsiah, Ebow
    Noh, Hyunjin
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2024, 67 (06): : 825 - 840
  • [44] Pandemic impact on patients with advanced non-COVID-19 illness and their family carers receiving specialised palliative home care: a qualitative study
    Nyblom, Stina
    Benkel, Inger
    Carling, Linnea
    Lofdahl, Elisabet
    Molander, Ulla
    Ohlen, Joakim
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [45] Advance Care Planning in a Multicultural Family Centric Community: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Professionals', Patients', and Caregivers' Perspectives
    Menon, Sumytra
    Kars, Marijke C.
    Malhotra, Chetna
    Campbell, Alastair V.
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (02) : 213 - +
  • [46] Strategies to Understand What Matters to Advanced Cancer Patients in Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Study Using the Lifeline Interview Method
    Takenouchi, Sayaka
    Chikada, Ai
    Mori, Masanori
    Tamura, Keiko
    Nin, Kazuko
    JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2022, 24 (04) : E135 - E143
  • [47] Advantages, barriers, and cues to advance care planning engagement in elderly patients with cancer and family members in Southern Thailand: a qualitative study
    Sripaew, Supakorn
    Assanangkornchai, Sawitri
    Limsomwong, Pawita
    Kittichet, Rungarun
    Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [48] "Research happens a lot in other settings-so why not here?" A qualitative interview study of stakeholders' views about advance planning for care home residents' research participation
    Nocivelli, Brittany
    Wood, Fiona
    Hood, Kerenza
    Wallace, Carolyn
    Shepherd, Victoria
    AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (10)
  • [49] Advance care planning for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on home non-invasive ventilation: A qualitative study exploring barriers, facilitators and patients' and healthcare professionals' recommendations
    Kavanagh, Emily
    Rowley, Grace
    Simkiss, Lauri
    Woods, Elizabeth
    Gouldthorpe, Craig
    Howorth, Kate
    Charles, Max
    Kiltie, Rachel
    Billett, Hannah
    Mastaglio, Francesca
    Dewhurst, Felicity
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 37 (09) : 1413 - 1423
  • [50] What Surrogates Understand (and Don't Understand) About Patients' Wishes After Engaging Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Analysis
    Simmons, David B.
    Levi, Benjamin H.
    Green, Michael J.
    La, In Seo
    Lipnick, Daniella
    Smith, Theresa J.
    Thiede, Elizabeth R.
    Wiegand, Debra L.
    Van Scoy, Lauren
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (04) : 427 - 432