Non-ecological factors affect human interaction with urban nature and perception of cultural ecosystem services

被引:2
作者
Tian, Tian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Sitong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Yifan [4 ]
Zeng, Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Yaoyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Che, Yue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm Sci, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Urban Ecol Proc & Ecorestorat, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Ecochongming IEC, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Ocean Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Urban park; Urban management; Indirect interaction; Non -ecological factors; COVID-19; SOCIAL VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2024.105643
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are not only affected by ecological factors, but also by non-ecological factors such as demographic and socio-political factors. Especially for CESs in urban ecosystems, it is necessary to study how the people 's perception of CESs change during the changes in social contexts and urban management. The COVID-19 outbreak caused dramatic changes for human society. In this study, we evaluated people 's perceptions of CESs provided by an urban park of Shanghai in four phases of the pre-, during and post-COVID period. It is found that aesthetic, historical and recreational values are perceived in the four phases, but the distribution of people 's perceptions for CESs varied considerably, influenced by the socio-political contexts. Besides, we emphasized the importance of focusing on the CESs perceived during the prohibited use, as this is a rare period when people were separated from the park and can only perceive CESs indirectly. People 's perception of CESs through indirect interactions with ecosystems has received little attention in previous research, but it should be valued by mangers to respond the issues of CESs equity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability [J].
Andersson, Erik ;
Tengo, Maria ;
McPhearson, Timon ;
Kremer, Peleg .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 :165-168
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, DOI DOI 10.18356/3405D09F-EN
[3]   The impact of greenspace proximity on stress levels and travel behavior among residents in Pasig city, Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Barquilla, Caryl Anne M. ;
Lee, Jeongwoo ;
He, Sylvia Y. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 97
[4]   High public appreciation for the cultural ecosystem services of urban and peri-urban forests during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Beckmann-Wubbelt, Angela ;
Fricke, Annika ;
Sebesvari, Zita ;
Yakouchenkova, Iulia Almeida ;
Froehlich, Katrin ;
Saha, Somidh .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 74
[5]  
Berghofer Augustin., 2011, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
[6]   Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use [J].
Bertram, Christine ;
Rehdanz, Katrin .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 :187-199
[7]   Demographic, natural and anthropogenic drivers for coastal Cultural ecosystem services in the Falkland Islands [J].
Blake, Denise ;
Carver, Stephen ;
Ziv, Guy .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 130
[8]   Ecosystem services - Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Petrosillo, Irene ;
Costanza, Robert .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :257-259
[9]   Evaluating and communicating cultural ecosystem services [J].
Cabana, David ;
Ryfield, Frances ;
Crowe, Tasman P. ;
Brannigan, John .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 42
[10]   Tourism research after the COVID-19 outbreak: Insights for more sustainable, local and smart cities [J].
Casado-Aranda, Luis-Alberto ;
Sanchez-Fernandez, Juan ;
Bastidas-Manzano, Ana-Belen .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 73