Insights into quality professionals' adoption of Quality 4.0 in the high-tech industry

被引:0
作者
Rogala, Piotr [1 ]
Brzozowski, Tomasz [2 ]
Pankowska, Malgorzata Bogumila [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Econ & Business, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Wroclaw Univ Econ & Business, Dept Qual & Environm Management, Wroclaw, Poland
[3] Univ Econ Katowice, Social Sci, Katowice, Poland
[4] Univ Econ Katowice, Dept Informat, Katowice, Poland
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Quality professionals; Technologies acceptance; High-tech industries; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; USER ACCEPTANCE; Q-TAM; MANAGERS;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-08-2023-0263
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper examines the factors influencing the adoption of Quality 4.0 technologies by quality professionals. The study evaluates perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards use, and intention to use new technologies.Design/methodology/approachThe research involves a literature review, identification of latent variables derived from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and a survey conducted among 200 quality professionals in the high-tech sector using computer-assisted web interviews.FindingsThe study elucidates the attitudes and intentions of high-tech industry employees towards adopting Quality 4.0 technologies. The primary conclusion drawn is that the predominant factor shaping the attitude of quality professionals towards new technologies is their confidence in their ability to effectively engage with these technologies rather than solely the perceived usefulness of such technologies to themselves or their organization.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is subject to certain limitations. Firstly, it focuses on five variables identified in the TAM model, potentially overlooking other pertinent factors that could provide a more comprehensive understanding. Secondly, the analysis of Quality 4.0 technologies is presented in a generalized manner, possibly resulting in nuanced differences if each specific technology were examined individually.Originality/valueThis article fills a gap in the literature by identifying the factors influencing quality professionals' adoption of Quality 4.0 technologies and delineating the relationships between these factors.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 214
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Aldag M.C., 2018, 3 INT C QUAL LIF
  • [2] Alrabadi T.D.S., 2023, International Journal of Data and Network Science, V7, P717, DOI [10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.2.006, DOI 10.5267/J.IJDNS.2023.2.006]
  • [3] Antony Jiju, 2013, TQM Journal, V25, P677, DOI 10.1108/TQM-07-2013-0079
  • [4] Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0-A qualitative global study
    Antony, Jiju
    McDermott, Olivia
    Sony, Michael
    Toner, Aidan
    Bhat, Shreeranga
    Cudney, Elizabeth A.
    Doulatabadi, Mehran
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 34 (7-8) : 827 - 846
  • [5] Establishing a link among total quality management, market orientation and organizational performance An empirical investigation
    Bhaskar, Hari Lal
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2020, 32 (06) : 1524 - 1524
  • [6] Prepared for work in Industry 4.0? Modelling the target activity system and five dimensions of worker readiness
    Blayone, Todd J. B.
    VanOostveen, Roland
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2021, 34 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [7] Q-TAM: a quality technology acceptance model for technology operations managers
    Boakye, Kwabena G.
    McGinnis, Thomas
    Prybutok, Victor R.
    [J]. OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (1-2) : 13 - 23
  • [8] Bradley J., 2009, Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems, P277, DOI [10.4018/978-1-60566-659-4.ch015, DOI 10.4018/978-1-60566-659-4.CH015]
  • [9] Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
    Brandon-Jones, Alistair
    Kauppi, Katri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (01) : 22 - 42
  • [10] Burcher P.G., 2008, The TQM Journal, V20, P45