The impact of after-school programs on K-12 students' creativity: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Yanjun [1 ]
Xu, Qianqian [1 ]
Zhang, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Jinhua 321004, Peoples R China
关键词
Creativity; After-school programs; K-12; Meta-analysis; ENRICHMENT PROGRAM; SELF-EFFICACY; TECHNOLOGY; SKILLS; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTION; PERSPECTIVES; ACHIEVEMENT; ATTITUDES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12564-024-09966-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In recent years, there was a significant increase in empirical research on fostering student creativity in after-school settings; however, there was no systematic review of the impact of after-school programs (ASP) on student creativity. The aim of this study was to systematically interpret the impact of ASP on student creativity with meta-analysis. This study brought together 25 experimental or quasi-experimental studies and 33 effect sizes. The findings suggested that ASP have a moderate positive impact on K-12 students' creativity (Hedge's = 0.674, 95% CI: 0.513-0.836). Subgroup analyses found that interventions of 0-7 days and 3-5 months had the best effects, with similar best effects in preschool and mixed ASP; the effects were similar across gender and time frame. On this basis, we analyzed the mechanisms or causes of the moderating variables affecting K-12 students' creativity and discussed measures to enhance students' creativity by constructing a blended ASP curriculum, optimizing the design of the project time, and focusing on creativity development of students in the lower grades.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 112 条
[81]  
김돈정, 2016, [The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 영재와 영재교육], V15, P123, DOI 10.17839/jksgt.2016.15.4.123
[82]  
Park J. H., 2023, Journal of Creativity, V33, DOI [10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100056, DOI 10.1016/J.YJOC.2023.100056]
[83]   Out-of-school-time study programmes: do they work? [J].
Pensiero, Nicola ;
Green, Francis .
OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2017, 43 (01) :127-147
[84]   Methodological Guidance Papers: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review [J].
Pigott, Terri D. ;
Polanin, Joshua R. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 90 (01) :24-46
[85]  
Piirto J., 1991, Roeper Review, V13, P142, DOI DOI 10.1080/02783199109553340
[86]  
Psaltis H., 2014, Summer School for the Arts: A Study of Arts Classes and Creative Thinking in Urban Teenagers
[87]   Supporting Creativity Or Conformity? Influence of Home Environment and Parental Factors on the Value of Children's Creativity Characteristics [J].
Pugsley, Lina ;
Acar, Selcuk .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2020, 54 (03) :598-609
[88]   Fostering students' creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program [J].
Ritter, Simone M. ;
Gu, Xiaojing ;
Crijns, Maurice ;
Biekens, Peter .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03)
[89]   Creativity training programs in primary education: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ruiz-del-Pino, Blanca ;
Fernandez-Martin, Francisco D. ;
Arco-Tirado, Jose L. .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2022, 46
[90]   A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school [J].
Runco, Mark A. ;
Acar, Selcuk ;
Cayirdag, Nur .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2017, 24 :242-249