Impact of size matching on survival post-heart transplant in infants: Estimated total cardiac-volume ratio outperforms donor-recipient weight ratio

被引:2
作者
Dani, Alia [1 ]
Ahmed, Hosam F. [1 ]
Guzman-Gomez, Amalia [1 ]
Raees, Muhammad A.
Zhang, Yin [3 ]
Hossain, Md Monir [2 ,3 ]
Szugye, Nicholas A. [2 ,4 ]
Moore, Ryan A. [2 ,4 ]
Morales, David L. S. [1 ]
Zafar, Farhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Epidemiol, Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cincinnati, OH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Infant heart transplant; Total cardiac volume; Size matching; OUTCOMES; SEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2023.08.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cardiac volume-based estimation offers an alternative to donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) in pediatric heart transplantation (HT) but has not been correlated to posttransplant outcomes. We sought to determine whether estimated total cardiac volume (eTCV) ratio is associated with HT survival in infants. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify infants (aged < 1 year) who received HT in 1987-2020. Donor and recipient eTCV were calculated from weight using previously published data. Patient cohort was divided according to the significant range of eTCV ratio; characteristics and survival were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2845 infants were identified. Hazard ratio with cubic spline showed prognostic relationship of eTCV ratio and DRWR with the overall survival. The cut point method determined an optimal eTCV ratio range predictive of infant survival was 1.05 to 1.85, whereas no range for DRWR was predictive. Overall, 75.6% of patients had an optimal total cardiac volume ratio, while 18.1% were in the lower (LR) and 6.3% in the higher (HR) group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better survival compared to HR (p = 0.0053). The optimal eTCV ratio group (n = 2,151) had DRWR, ranging from 1.09 to 5; 34.3% had DRWR of 2% to 3%, and 5.0% had DRWR of > 3. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, an upper DRWR limit has not been established in infants. Therefore, determining the optimal eTCV range is important to identify an upper limit that significantly predicts survival benefit. This finding suggests a potential increase in donor pool for infant recipients since over 40% of donors in the optimal eTCV range include DRWR values > 2 that are traditionally not considered for candidate listing. (c) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1277
页数:12
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Impact of Predicted Heart Mass-Based Donor-Recipient Size Matching on Transplant Outcomes
    Gliozzi, Gregorio
    Loforte, Antonio
    Mariani, Carlo
    Cavalli, Giulio Giovanni
    Botta, Luca
    Santamaria, Valeria
    Tassi, Sara
    Martin-Suarez, Sofia
    Potena, Luciano
    Pacini, Davide
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 54 (03) : 774 - 781
  • [2] Impact of donor-recipient age on cardiac transplant survival. Subanalysis of the Spanish Heart Transplant Registry
    Lopez-Vilella, Raquel
    Gonzalez-Vilchez, Francisco
    Crespo-Leiro, Maria G.
    Segovia-Cubero, Javier
    Cobo, Manuel
    Delgado-Jimenez, Juan
    Arizon del Prado, Jose Maria
    Martinez-Selles, Manuel
    Sobrino Marquez, Jose Manuel
    Mirabet-Perez, Sonia
    Gonzalez-Costello, Jose
    Perez-Villa, Felix
    Luis Lambert-Rodriguez, Jose
    Rabago-Aracil, Gregorio
    Teresa Blasco-Peiro, Maria
    de la Fuente-Galan, Luis
    Garrido-Bravo, Iris
    Otero, Deborah
    Almenar-Bonet, Luis
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2021, 74 (05): : 393 - 401
  • [3] A novel method of donor.recipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: A total cardiac volume.predictive model
    Szugye, Nicholas A.
    Zafar, Farhan
    Ollberding, Nicholas J.
    Villa, Chet
    Lorts, Angela
    Taylor, Michael D.
    Morales, David L. S.
    Moore, Ryan A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (02) : 158 - 165