Outcomes with the Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) for the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence After Prostate Surgery and the Impact of Previous Radiotherapy

被引:0
作者
Roth, Ingunn [1 ]
Juliebo-Jones, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Moen, Christian Arvei [1 ,2 ]
Beisland, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Hjelle, Karin M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Urol, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 62卷
关键词
Incontinence; Adjustable transobturator male; system continence device; Efficacy; Male stress urinary incontinence; Radiotherapy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) is an established treatment for patients with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and the complication burdens associated with ATOMS with a focus on exploring the potential impact on previous radiotherapy (RT). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis for consecutive patients who underwent ATOMS implantation procedure at a tertiary center over an 11-yr study period. Outcomes of interest were dryness at 3-mo follow up, postoperative complications ( <= 30 d), and late treatment failures (>30 d). Key findings and limitations: A total of 118 patients underwent ATOMS surgery performed by five different surgeons. Median follow-up was 67 mo (interquartile range 41-95). The mean 24-h pad count after surgery was 1.1 (range 0-8) and the mean reduction in pad weight was 179 g (range 0-1080). There was no significant difference in the reduction in pad use between groups with and without RT ( - 1.7 vs - 2.4; p = 0.13). Multivariable analysis revealed that RT, degree of incontinence, and age were not risk factors for reoperation. Conclusions and clinical implications: ATOMS implantation is feasible in patients who have undergone prostate RT and patients with severe stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. We found that RT was not a risk factor for reoperation and there was no significant difference in pad weight reduction by RT status. This study offers new insight into potential incontinence surgery for male patients with stress urinary incontinence and previous RT. Patient summary: We assessed outcomes for patients who had an ATOMS (adjustable transobturator male system) device implanted to control stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. After implantation, 52.5% of the patients reported zero leakage and 39.9% reported only mild incontinence. Our results show that this device can improve continence after prostate surgery and is also suitable in patients who underwent radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men
    Hoda, M. Raschid
    Primus, Guenter
    Fischereder, Katja
    Von Heyden, Burkhard
    Mohammed, Nasreldin
    Schmid, Norbert
    Moll, Volker
    Hamza, Amir
    Karsch, Johannes J.
    Broessner, Clemens
    Fornara, Paolo
    Bauer, Wilhelm
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (02) : 296 - 303
  • [42] Comparison of Outcomes for Adjustable Bulbourethral Male Sling and Artificial Urinary Sphincter After Previous Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion REPLY
    Tuygun, Can
    Imamoglu, Abdurrahim
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (06) : 1368 - 1369
  • [43] Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Larson, Troy
    Jhaveri, Hasan
    Yeung, Lawrence L.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 (08) : 2051 - 2059
  • [44] A new adjustable artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence (VictoTM): preliminary clinical results
    Ameli, Ghazal
    Huesch, Tanja
    Huebner, Wilhelm A.
    Weibl, Peter
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (08) : 1546 - 1554
  • [45] Considerations about the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS®) device... is it really all so easy?
    Gozzi, Christian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (05) : 655 - 656
  • [46] Male sling versus artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of incontinence after prostate surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Chen, Hai-Chao
    Hu, Peng-Cheng
    Yao, Jia-Tao
    Ye, Shi-Jie
    Ma, Qi
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (08) : 1416 - 1424
  • [47] Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery
    Guimaraes, Miguel
    Oliveira, Rui
    Pinto, Rui
    Soares, Alfredo
    Maia, Eurico
    Botelho, Francisco
    Sousa, Teixeira
    Pina, Francisco
    Dinis, Paulo
    Cruz, Francisco
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) : 500 - 504
  • [48] A narrative review on surgical treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence
    Prebay, Zachary J.
    Foss, Halle E.
    Wang, Kerith R.
    Chung, Paul H.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2023, 12 (05) : 874 - +
  • [49] An Adjustable Sling for the Treatment of All Degrees of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: Retrospective Evaluation of Efficacy and Complications After a Minimal Followup of 14 Months
    Bochove-Overgaauw, Deirdre M.
    Schrier, Bart Ph.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04) : 1363 - 1368
  • [50] Sequential treatment with ProACT™ device implantation after male sling failure for male urinary incontinence
    Baron, M. G.
    Delcourt, C.
    Nouhaud, F. -X.
    Gillibert, A.
    Pfister, C.
    Grise, P.
    Cornu, J. -N.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2017, 27 (17): : 1098 - 1103