How do institutional dimensions of open government data affect innovation? Evidence from research institutes in China

被引:4
作者
Mu, Rui [1 ]
Zhao, Xiaxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Dalian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Open government data; Institutional design; Innovation; Scientific research; China; Data interaction; TRANSPARENCY; CREATIVITY; ADOPTION; BIG; PORTALS; PRIVACY;
D O I
10.1108/AJIM-07-2023-0243
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study investigates the individual and binary (i.e. combined) effects of institutional dimensions of open government data (which include instructional, structural and accessible rules) on scientific research innovation, as well as the mediating roles that researchers' perceived data usefulness and data capability play in between.Design/methodology/approachBased on a sample of 1,092 respondents, this study uses partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and polynomial regression with response surface analysis to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of individual and binary institutional dimensions on scientific research innovation.FindingsThe findings demonstrate that instructional, structural and restricted access data have a positive effect on scientific research innovation in the individual effect. While the binary effect of institutional dimensions produces varying degrees of scientific research innovation. Furthermore, this study discovers that the perceived usefulness and data capability of researchers differ in the mediating effect of institutional dimensions on scientific research innovation.Originality/valueTheoretically, this study contributes new knowledge on the causal links between data publication institutions and innovation. Practically, the research findings offer government data managers timely suggestions on how to build up institutions to foster greater data usage.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective [J].
Altayar, Mohammed Saleh .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 35 (04) :633-643
[2]   A systematic review of open government data initiatives [J].
Attard, Judie ;
Orlandi, Fabrizio ;
Scerri, Simon ;
Auer, Soeren .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (04) :399-418
[3]   On design and deployment of two privacy-preserving procedures for judicial-data dissemination [J].
Bargh, Mortaza S. ;
Choenni, Sunil ;
Meijer, Ronald .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (03) :481-493
[4]  
Bertot J. C., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P2491, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.658
[5]   Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo [J].
Bonina, Carla ;
Eaton, Ben .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 37 (03)
[6]   A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study [J].
Chin, WW ;
Marcolin, BL ;
Newsted, PR .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (02) :189-217
[7]   BUILDING THEORY ABOUT THEORY BUILDING: WHAT CONSTITUTES A THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION? [J].
Corley, Kevin G. ;
Gioia, Dennis A. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 36 (01) :12-32
[8]  
Curty R., 2015, Beyond 'data thrifting': an investigation of factors influencing research data reuse in the social science
[9]   Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency [J].
Dawes, Sharon S. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 27 (04) :377-383
[10]   Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development [J].
Diamantopoulos, A ;
Winklhofer, HM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :269-277