The evolving role of technology transfer offices in the entrepreneurial university: Go-betweens or playmakers?

被引:1
作者
Chen, Zoe [1 ]
Little, Vicki Janine [2 ]
Thuan, Nguyen Hoang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Business Sch, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] RMIT Univ, Business Sch, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
关键词
Entrepreneurial university; Technology transfer offices; Knowledge transfer; Research commercialisation; Quintuple helix stakeholders; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; COMMERCIALIZATION; INVENTIONS; INNOVATION; SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-024-10123-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Technology transfer offices (TTOs) play an increasingly important role in universities, supporting researchers in translating science knowledge into commercially and socially valuable outcomes. However, the literature is limited regarding how TTOs support the technology transfer process. This study contributes deeper insight into the role of TTOs in facilitating knowledge transfer outcomes. A case study of life science commercialization in Australasian universities drew on depth interviews with senior TTO managers and industry experts, on longitudinal participant observation within a life science intermediary business to inform about supply side elements, and on secondary data. The findings emphasise the effects of wider institutional change on quintuple helix (5H) stakeholders, i.e., the environment, society, government, universities, and industry. Financialization and competition places growing demands on universities for commercializable intellectual property (IP) production. In response, TTOs have built competencies in translational engagement (trust and reputation building and boundary spanning) and value co-creation (service quality management and de-risking). Those competencies translate to a five-stage process of technology transfer facilitation: (1) Identifying, (2) assessing, (3) protecting, (4) promoting and (5) profiting. In the complex context of life science innovation, innovation networks benefit from investment in university outreach, stakeholder relationship building, tax credits, and fund matching with transnational corporations. To ensure optimal social and commercial outcomes independent oversight of the process should be maintained, by representatives from all 5H stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1060 / 1079
页数:20
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities [J].
Abreu, Maria ;
Grinevich, Vadim .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (02) :408-422
[2]   Does policy influence the commercialization route? Evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists [J].
Aldridge, Taylor ;
Audretsch, David B. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (05) :583-588
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Implementation Progress and Results Report
[4]  
Australian Research Council, 2017, INTERNATIONAL
[5]  
AUTM, 2007, 9 POINTS CONSIDER LI
[6]   Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: a framework from critical literature review [J].
Battistella, Cinzia ;
De Toni, Alberto F. ;
Pillon, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (05) :1195-1234
[7]  
Bejarano J. B. P., 2023, J OPEN INNOV-TECHNOL
[8]   Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level [J].
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Feldman, Maryann .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (01) :69-89
[9]   Technology Transfer Offices: a Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Perspective [J].
Bezerra, Samira Yusef Araujo de Falani ;
Torkomian, Ana Lucia Vitale .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) :4455-4488
[10]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]