Temporal context effects on suboptimal choice

被引:2
作者
McDevitt, Margaret A. [1 ]
Pisklak, Jeffrey M. [2 ]
Dunn, Roger M. [3 ]
Spetch, Marcia L. [2 ]
机构
[1] McDaniel Coll, Westminster, MD 21157 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] San Diego State Univ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Suboptimal choice; Temporal context; Initial-link duration; Conditioned reinforcement; SiGN model; Pigeon; DELAY; REINFORCEMENT; PREFERENCE; MULTIPLE; MODEL; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION; CONCURRENT; BEHAVIOR; PIGEONS;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-024-02519-y
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Choice can be driven both by rewards and stimuli that signal those rewards. Under certain conditions, pigeons will prefer options that lead to less probable reward when the reward is signaled. A recently quantified model, the Signal for Good News (SiGN) model, assumes that in the context of uncertainty, signals for a reduced delay to reward reinforce choice. The SiGN model provides an excellent fit to previous results from pigeons and the current studies are the first to test a priori quantitative predictions. Pigeons chose between a suboptimal alternative that led to signaled 20% food and an optimal alternative that led to 50% food. The duration of the choice period was manipulated across conditions in two experiments. Pigeons strongly preferred the suboptimal alternative at the shorter durations and strongly preferred the optimal alternative at the longer durations. The results from both experiments fit well with predictions from the SiGN model and show that altering the duration of the choice period has a dramatic effect in that it changes which of the two options pigeons prefer. More generally, these results suggest that the relative value of options is not fixed, but instead depends on the temporal context.
引用
收藏
页码:2737 / 2745
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information [J].
Ajuwon, Victor ;
Ojeda, Andres ;
Murphy, Robin A. ;
Monteiro, Tiago ;
Kacelnik, Alex .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2023, 26 (02) :623-637
[2]   PREFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE VERSUS MIXED SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT [J].
ALSOP, B ;
DAVISON, M .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1986, 45 (01) :33-45
[3]  
Anselme P., 2023, Animal Behavior and Cognition, V10, P366, DOI [10.26451/abc.10.04.05.2023, DOI 10.26451/ABC.10.04.05.2023]
[4]  
Anselme P, 2022, EVOLUTION OF LEARNING AND MEMORY MECHANISMS, P193
[5]   Time and Associative Learning [J].
Balsam, Peter D. ;
Drew, Michael R. ;
Gallistel, C. R. .
COMPARATIVE COGNITION & BEHAVIOR REVIEWS, 2010, 5 :1-22
[6]   Intrinsic Valuation of Information in Decision Making under Uncertainty [J].
Bennett, Daniel ;
Bode, Stefan ;
Brydevall, Maja ;
Warren, Hayley ;
Murawski, Carsten .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 12 (07)
[7]   Orbitofrontal Cortex Uses Distinct Codes for Different Choice Attributes in Decisions Motivated by Curiosity [J].
Blanchard, Tommy C. ;
Hayden, Benjamin Y. ;
Bromberg-Martin, Ethan S. .
NEURON, 2015, 85 (03) :602-614
[8]   When knowledge hurts: humans are willing to receive pain for obtaining non-instrumental information [J].
Bode, Stefan ;
Sun, Xiaoyu ;
Jiwa, Matthew ;
Cooper, Patrick S. ;
Chong, Trevor T. -J. ;
Egorova-Brumley, Natalia .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 290 (2002)
[9]  
Borenstein M., 2009, INTRO META ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386
[10]   A neural mechanism for conserved value computations integrating information and rewards [J].
Bromberg-Martin, Ethan S. ;
Feng, Yang-Yang ;
Ogasawara, Takaya ;
White, J. Kael ;
Zhang, Kaining ;
Monosov, Ilya E. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 27 (01) :159-175