Temporal context effects on suboptimal choice

被引:2
|
作者
Mcdevitt, Margaret A. [1 ]
Pisklak, Jeffrey M. [2 ]
Dunn, Roger M. [3 ]
Spetch, Marcia L. [2 ]
机构
[1] McDaniel Coll, Westminster, MD 21157 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] San Diego State Univ, San Diego, CA USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Suboptimal choice; Temporal context; Initial-link duration; Conditioned reinforcement; SiGN model; Pigeon; DELAY; REINFORCEMENT; PREFERENCE; MULTIPLE; MODEL; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION; CONCURRENT; BEHAVIOR; PIGEONS;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-024-02519-y
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Choice can be driven both by rewards and stimuli that signal those rewards. Under certain conditions, pigeons will prefer options that lead to less probable reward when the reward is signaled. A recently quantified model, the Signal for Good News (SiGN) model, assumes that in the context of uncertainty, signals for a reduced delay to reward reinforce choice. The SiGN model provides an excellent fit to previous results from pigeons and the current studies are the first to test a priori quantitative predictions. Pigeons chose between a suboptimal alternative that led to signaled 20% food and an optimal alternative that led to 50% food. The duration of the choice period was manipulated across conditions in two experiments. Pigeons strongly preferred the suboptimal alternative at the shorter durations and strongly preferred the optimal alternative at the longer durations. The results from both experiments fit well with predictions from the SiGN model and show that altering the duration of the choice period has a dramatic effect in that it changes which of the two options pigeons prefer. More generally, these results suggest that the relative value of options is not fixed, but instead depends on the temporal context.
引用
收藏
页码:2737 / 2745
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suboptimal Choice, Reward-Predictive Signals, and Temporal Information
    Cunningham, Paul J.
    Shahan, Timothy A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2018, 44 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [2] How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?
    Hinnenkamp, Jay E.
    Shahan, Timothy A.
    Madden, Gregory J.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2017, 107 (01) : 136 - 150
  • [3] Context effects on choice
    Goldshmidt, JN
    Lattal, KM
    Fantino, E
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1998, 70 (03) : 301 - 320
  • [4] EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT CONTEXT ON CHOICE
    JACOB, TC
    FANTINO, E
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1988, 49 (03) : 367 - 381
  • [5] GENERICALLY SUBOPTIMAL CHOICE
    HERRNSTEIN, RJ
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1991, 21 (02) : 190 - 191
  • [6] EFFECTS OF TEMPORAL CONTEXT OF INFORMATION
    BAVELAS, JB
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1973, 32 (03) : 695 - 698
  • [7] CONTEXT EFFECTS IN CONSUMER JUDGMENT AND CHOICE
    HERR, PM
    KARDES, FR
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1989, 16 : 195 - 196
  • [8] Context and task effects on choice deferral
    Dhar R.
    Marketing Letters, 1997, 8 (1) : 119 - 130
  • [9] Incorporating Context Effects into a Choice Model
    Rooderkerk, Robert P.
    Van Heerde, Harald J.
    Bijmolt, Tammo H. A.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (04) : 767 - 780
  • [10] Human and pigeon suboptimal choice
    Margaret A. McDevitt
    James W. Diller
    Malvina O. Pietrzykowski
    Learning & Behavior, 2019, 47 : 334 - 343