DrugPose: benchmarking 3D generative methods for early stage drug discovery

被引:3
作者
Jocys, Zygimantas [1 ]
Grundy, Joanna [1 ]
Farrahi, Katayoun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Southampton, Southampton, England
来源
DIGITAL DISCOVERY | 2024年 / 3卷 / 07期
关键词
DESIGN;
D O I
10.1039/d4dd00076e
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Molecule generation in 3D space has gained attention in the past few years. These models typically have a hypothesis that they need to satisfy (i.e. shape) or they are designed to fit into a protein pocket. However, there's been limited evaluation of the 3D poses they produce. In the previous work, the generated molecules are redocked and the generated poses are disregarded. Moreover, many of the generated molecules are not synthesisable and druglike. To tackle these challenges we propose DrugPose, a novel benchmark framework, that utilises Simbind to evaluate the generated molecules based on their coherence with the initial hypothesis formed from available data (e.g., active compounds and protein structures) and their adherence to the laws of physics. Moreover, it offers enhanced insights into synthesizability by directly cross-referencing with a commercial database and utilising the Ghose filter for assessing drug-likeness. Considering current generative methods, the percentage of generated molecules with the intended binding mode ranges from 4.7% to 15.9%, with commercial accessibility spanning 23.6% to 38.8% and fully satisfying the Ghose filter between 10% and 40%. These results highlight the need for further research to develop more reliable and transparent methodologies for 3D molecule generation. Molecule generation in 3D space has gained attention in the past few years.
引用
收藏
页码:1308 / 1318
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Adams K., 2023, 11 INT C LEARNING RE
[2]   Generative Models as an Emerging Paradigm in the Chemical Sciences [J].
Anstine, Dylan M. ;
Isayev, Olexandr .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 145 (16) :8736-8750
[3]   MolGPT: Molecular Generation Using a Transformer-Decoder Model [J].
Bagal, Viraj ;
Aggarwal, Rishal ;
Vinod, P. K. ;
Priyakumar, U. Deva .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2022, 62 (09) :2064-2076
[4]  
Bickerton GR, 2012, NAT CHEM, V4, P90, DOI [10.1038/nchem.1243, 10.1038/NCHEM.1243]
[5]   Generative models for molecular discovery: Recent advances and challenges [J].
Bilodeau, Camille ;
Jin, Wengong ;
Jaakkola, Tommi ;
Barzilay, Regina ;
Jensen, Klavs F. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (05)
[6]  
Blaschke T., 2020, ChemRxiv, DOI [DOI 10.26434/CHEMRXIV.12058026.V1, 10.26434/chemrxiv.12058026.v1]
[7]   GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for de Novo Molecular Design [J].
Brown, Nathan ;
Fiscato, Marco ;
Segler, Marwin H. S. ;
Vaucher, Alain C. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2019, 59 (03) :1096-1108
[8]   PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences [J].
Buttenschoen, Martin ;
Morris, Garrett M. ;
Deane, Charlotte M. .
CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 15 (09) :3130-3139
[9]  
Cao N. D., 2022, Molgan: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphs
[10]   Generative Models Should at Least Be Able to Design Molecules That Dock Well: A New Benchmark [J].
Cieplinski, Tobiasz ;
Danel, Tomasz ;
Podlewska, Sabina ;
Jastrzebski, Stanislaw .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2023, 63 (11) :3238-3247