Clinical Observation of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Ossified Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Pengfei [1 ]
Shi, Zhen [1 ]
Jiang, Yunduo [1 ]
Peng, Zhibin [1 ]
Wang, Yansong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped Surg, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] NHC Key Lab Cell Transplantat, Harbin, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Med Univ, Heilongjiang Prov Key Lab Hard Tissue Dev & Regene, Harbin, Peoples R China
关键词
Decompression; Endoscope; Minimally invasive; Ossification; Spinal stenosis; LIGAMENTUM-FLAVUM; DISC HERNIATION; OSSIFICATION; FUSION; INJECTIONS; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS; FRACTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of 10-mm endoscopic minimally invasive interlaminar decompression in the treatment of ossified lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: The clinical data of 50 consecutive patients with ossified lumbar spinal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent minimally invasive interlaminar decompression with 10-mm endoscope. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Visual analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess clinical outcomes. The lateral recess angle, real spinal canal area, and effective intervertebral foramen area were used to assess the effect of decompression. Results: The mean age of all patients was 59.0 +/- 12.3 years. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 43.7 +/- 8.7 minutes and <20 ml, respectively. Two years after surgery, the leg pain Visual analog scale score decreased from 7.4 +/- 1.0 to 1.6 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.05) and the Oswestry disability index score decreased from 63.8 +/- 7.6 to 21.7 +/- 3.4 (P < 0.05). The lateral recess angle, real spinal canal area and effective intervertebral foramen area were significantly larger than before surgery (P < 0.05). The overall excellent and good rate at the last follow-up was 92.0% according to the modified Macnab criteria. Conclusions: The 10-mm endoscopic minimally invasive interlaminar decompression can safely and effectively remove the ossification in the spinal canal and achieve adequate decompression in patients with ossified lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:E129 / E135
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Review
    Zhang, Jun
    Liu, Tang-Fen
    Shan, Hua
    Wan, Zhong-Yuan
    Wang, Zhe
    Viswanath, Omar
    Paladini, Antonella
    Varrassi, Giustino
    Wang, Hai-Qiang
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (02) : 941 - 959
  • [32] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Hua, Wenbin
    Wang, Bingjin
    Ke, Wencan
    Xiang, Qian
    Wu, Xinghuo
    Zhang, Yukun
    Li, Shuai
    Yang, Shuhua
    Wu, Qiang
    Yang, Cao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 7
  • [33] Clinical outcomes of uniportal compared with biportal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ariel Kaen
    Man Kyu Park
    Sang-Kyu Son
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 2717 - 2725
  • [34] Minimally invasive unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Chen, Kevin S.
    Than, Khoi D.
    LaMarca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
  • [35] Clinical outcomes of uniportal compared with biportal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kaen, Ariel
    Park, Man Kyu
    Son, Sang-Kyu
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (08) : 2717 - 2725
  • [36] A decision tree analysis to predict clinical outcome of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with and without coexisting spondylolisthesis and scoliosis
    Toyoda, Hiromitsu
    Terai, Hidetomi
    Yamada, Kentaro
    Kato, Minori
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Takahashi, Shinji
    Tamai, Koji
    Yabu, Akito
    Iwamae, Masayoshi
    Sawada, Yuta
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (07) : 973 - 981
  • [37] Efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis in elderly patients
    Li, Xin-Feng
    Jin, Lin-Yu
    Lv, Zhen-Dong
    Su, Xin-Jin
    Wang, Kun
    Shen, Hong-Xing
    Song, Xiao-Xing
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (02) : 1417 - 1424
  • [38] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression
    Scholler, Karsten
    Alimi, Marjan
    Cong, Guang-Ting
    Christos, Paul
    Hartl, Roger
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (03) : 355 - 367
  • [39] Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression
    McGrath, Lynn B., Jr.
    White-Dzuro, Gabrielle A.
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (04) : 491 - 499
  • [40] Case-matched radiological and clinical outcome evaluation of interlaminar versus microsurgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Babak Saravi
    Sara Ülkümen
    Gernot Lang
    Sébastien Couillard-Després
    Frank Hassel
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 2863 - 2874