The Diagnostic Characteristic and Reproducibility of Bone Scintigraphy Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/ Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Aseptic Loosening of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:2
作者
Puijk, Raymond [1 ]
Lubbe, Pieter [1 ]
Sierevelt, Inger N. [1 ,2 ]
Kristians, Angela E. [3 ]
Boer, Jouke [3 ]
Nolte, Peter A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Spaarne Gasthuis, Dept Orthopaed, Spaarnepoort 1, NL-2134 TM Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[2] Xpert Clin, Orthoped Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Spaarne Gasthuis, Dept Med Nucl Imaging, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent ACTA, Dept Oral Cell Biol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; aseptic loosening; scintigraphy; SPECT; diagnostic; test characteristics; SPECT/CT; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic characteristics of bone scintigraphy single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (BS-SPECT/CT) for diagnosing aseptic loosening after uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to evaluate the following aspects: how to manage inconclusive results, the interobserver reliability, and the location of tracer uptake between symptomatic cases with and without aseptic loosening. Methods: In this study, 180 patients who had uncemented TKA and persistent knee pain suspected of aseptic loosening were included. As part of routine medical care, BS-SPECT/CT was used, and its results were compared with the reference standard, which involved revision surgery for aseptic loosening or a 12-month follow-up without revision or imaging. Inconclusive BS-SPECT/CT results were considered either negative (best-case scenario) or positive (worst-case scenario). Sensitivity, specificity, positive/ negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and positive/negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by comparing the diagnostic characteristics between cases with a follow-up of less and more than 2 years of follow-up. The anatomical distribution of tracer uptake and interobserver reliability were also evaluated. Results: Of the 180 BS-SPECT/CT scans conducted, 22 were determined positive, 113 negative, and 45 inconclusive. The best-case scenario showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 93.8%, +LR 10.8, -LR 0.4, PPV 54.6%, and NPV 96.2%. In contrast, the worst-case scenario had a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 69.1%, +LR 3.1, -LR 0.1, PPV 25.4%, and NPV 99.1%. Sensitivity analyses revealed no relevant differences in characteristics between the 2 TKA-interval groups. The interobserver reliability was fair-to-moderate (K = 0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.60), with an estimated agreement of 79% (95% confidence interval 70 to 87). Four prosthetic zones had a notably higher proportion of cases with tracer uptake in those with aseptic loosening compared to those without. Conclusions: The test characteristics of BS-SPECT/CT were deemed appropriate in patients who have complaints of uncemented TKA suspected of aseptic loosening. Inconclusive cases were best categorized as negative, especially in patients who have a short interval between TKA and the first BS-SPECT/CT. Increased tracer uptake in 4 prosthetic zones was observed in cases of aseptic loosening, although interobserver reliability was fair to moderate. Level of Evidence: Level III, Diagnostic Retrospective Cohort Study. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1713.e1
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The Accuracy of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Arthrography in Evaluating Aseptic Loosening of Hip and Knee Prostheses
    Abele, Jonathan T.
    Swami, Vimarsha G.
    Russell, Gordon
    Masson, Edward C. O.
    Flemming, Jeffrey P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (09) : 1647 - 1651
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, The New Zealand joint register annual report
  • [3] The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of painful joint prostheses
    Arican, Pelin
    Tekin, Berna Okudan
    Sefizade, Riza
    Naldoken, Seniha
    Bastug, Aliye
    Ozkurt, Bulent
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (09) : 931 - 940
  • [4] Detection of aseptic loosening in total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barnsley, Lara
    Barnsley, Les
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (10) : 1565 - 1572
  • [5] Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?
    Bourne, Robert B.
    Chesworth, Bert M.
    Davis, Aileen M.
    Mahomed, Nizar N.
    Charron, Kory D. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [6] Radionuclide arthrogram with SPECT/CT for the evaluation of mechanical loosening of hip and knee prostheses
    Chew, Chong Ghee
    Lewis, Peter
    Middleton, Fiona
    van den Wijngaard, Rene
    Deshaies, Annie
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (10) : 735 - 743
  • [7] Diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy for aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty
    Claassen, Leif
    Ettinger, Max
    Plaass, Christian
    Daniilidis, Kiriakos
    Calliess, Tilman
    Ezechieli, Marco
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2014, 22 (05) : 767 - 773
  • [8] STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
    Cohen, Jeremie F.
    Korevaar, Daniel A.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Bruns, David E.
    Gatsonis, Constantine A.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Irwig, Les
    Levine, Deborah
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [9] How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry
    Deere, Kevin
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Sayers, Adrian
    Price, Andrew J.
    Mason, James
    Blom, Ashley W.
    [J]. LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 3 (06) : E438 - E446
  • [10] EWALD FC, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9