Effects of alliance portfolio breadth and depth on exploratory and exploitative innovation: Evidence from Indian high-tech sectors

被引:3
作者
Shukla, Dhirendra Mani [1 ,3 ]
Mital, Amita [1 ]
Qureshi, Israr [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Lucknow, India
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, Australia
[3] 216 Fac Block,IIM Lucknow Campus, Lucknow 226013, India
关键词
Alliance portfolio breadth; Alliance portfolio depth; Exploratory innovation; Exploitative innovation; Collaborative innovation; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PARTNER DIVERSITY; COLLABORATION; EMBEDDEDNESS; NETWORKS; SEARCH; IMPACT; DIMENSIONS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114686
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Firms increasingly pursue collaborative innovation using alliance portfolios (APs) to enhance innovation outcomes. AP breadth and depth are two important dimensions of collaborative innovation. AP breadth enhances a firm's access to a variety of external knowledge whereas AP depth helps integration of external knowledge. This study examined how AP breadth and depth, separately and jointly, affect firm innovation. Drawing primarily on the organisational learning perspective, we suggested that AP breadth enhances a firm's exploratory innovation but lowers its exploitative innovation. However, AP depth improves a firm's exploitative innovation but diminishes its exploratory innovation. Further, we suggested that the interaction effect of AP breadth and depth is negative for exploratory innovation whereas it is positive for exploitative innovation. An empirical investigation conducted on a longitudinal dataset of Indian firms from high-tech sectors broadly supported our theoretical arguments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Lampert, CM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (6-7) :521-543
[2]   Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures [J].
Arts, Sam ;
Hou, Jianan ;
Gomez, Juan Carlos .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (02)
[3]  
Blau P.M., 1977, Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure
[4]  
Cameron AC., 2005, Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811241
[5]   Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research [J].
Certo, S. Trevis ;
Busenbark, John R. ;
Woo, Hyun-Soo ;
Semadeni, Matthew .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (13) :2639-2657
[6]   When one door closes, another door opens ... for some: Evidence from the post-TRIPS Indian pharmaceutical industry [J].
Chattopadhyay, Shinjinee ;
Bercovitz, Janet .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (06) :988-1022
[7]  
Chesbrough H. W., 2003, Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2008.00502.X
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]   Alliance Portfolio Resource Diversity and Firm Innovation [J].
Cui, Anna S. ;
O'Connor, Gina .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2012, 76 (04) :24-43
[10]   Some Common Myths About Centering Predictor Variables in Moderated Multiple Regression and Polynomial Regression [J].
Dalal, Dev K. ;
Zickar, Michael J. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 15 (03) :339-362