Are trade wars class wars? The importance of trade-induced horizontal inequality

被引:0
|
作者
Borusyak, Kirill [1 ,2 ]
Jaravel, Xavier [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] CEPR, London, England
[3] LSE, London, England
[4] Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Trade liberalization; Distributional effects; Inequality; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; DEMAND; INCOME; TECHNOLOGY; GRAVITY; DIFFERENTIATION; GLOBALIZATION; COMPETITION; EMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103935
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
What is the nature of the distributional effects of trade? This paper demonstrates conceptually and empirically the importance of "trade -induced horizontal inequality,"i.e. inequality that occurs among workers with the same level of earnings before the trade shock. This type of inequality does not affect the income distribution but generates winners and losers at all income levels. To quantify the horizontal inequality and changes in the income distribution induced by trade in a data -driven way, we develop a characterization of the welfare impacts, governed by simple and intuitive statistics of labor market and consumption exposure to trade. In the U.S., we find substantial heterogeneity in exposure and thus in the welfare effects of trade shocks across workers. Over 99% of the variance of welfare changes from trade shocks arises within income deciles. These findings run against a popular narrative that "trade wars are class wars."
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据